BACKGROUND: Aortic root diameter (AoD) increases with aging and is related to body size. AoD is also presumed to increase in hypertension. In prior studies, however, after adjusting for age and body size, AoD did not differ between hypertensive and normotensive (NT) individuals. Hypertension is a heterogeneous condition with various subtypes that differ in pathophysiology and age distribution. We assessed whether AoD differs among subjects with the various subtypes of hypertension and nonhypertensive individuals. METHODS: In 1,256 volunteers aged 30-79 years (48% women, 48% hypertensive; all untreated), AoD was measured at the sinuses of Valsalva with transthoracic echocardiography. Using cutoff values based on the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, subjects were identified as NT (23%), or prehypertensive (PH, 29%), or as having isolated diastolic (IDH, 6%), isolated systolic (ISH, 12%), or systolic-diastolic (SDH, 30%) hypertension. Groups were compared using analysis of variance with Bonferroni's correction. RESULTS: AoD increased with age and body surface area (BSA) in both men (r = 0.25 and 0.19, respectively) and women (r = 0.30 and 0.22, respectively) (all P < 0.0001). In men, those identified as having IDH, ISH, and SDH each had a 6% larger AoD than NT individuals (all P < 0.05). In women, those identified with ISH and SDH had a 10 and 8% larger AoD than NT individuals, respectively (all P < 0.05). In both sexes, after indexing to BSA, only ISH individuals exhibited larger AoD compared with NT individuals (both P < 0.05). But, with further adjustment for age, these differences were no longer observed. CONCLUSIONS: Even when the subtypes of hypertension are examined separately, age and BSA, not hypertension status, account for the AoD differences between NT and hypertensive subjects.
BACKGROUND: Aortic root diameter (AoD) increases with aging and is related to body size. AoD is also presumed to increase in hypertension. In prior studies, however, after adjusting for age and body size, AoD did not differ between hypertensive and normotensive (NT) individuals. Hypertension is a heterogeneous condition with various subtypes that differ in pathophysiology and age distribution. We assessed whether AoD differs among subjects with the various subtypes of hypertension and nonhypertensive individuals. METHODS: In 1,256 volunteers aged 30-79 years (48% women, 48% hypertensive; all untreated), AoD was measured at the sinuses of Valsalva with transthoracic echocardiography. Using cutoff values based on the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, subjects were identified as NT (23%), or prehypertensive (PH, 29%), or as having isolated diastolic (IDH, 6%), isolated systolic (ISH, 12%), or systolic-diastolic (SDH, 30%) hypertension. Groups were compared using analysis of variance with Bonferroni's correction. RESULTS: AoD increased with age and body surface area (BSA) in both men (r = 0.25 and 0.19, respectively) and women (r = 0.30 and 0.22, respectively) (all P < 0.0001). In men, those identified as having IDH, ISH, and SDH each had a 6% larger AoD than NT individuals (all P < 0.05). In women, those identified with ISH and SDH had a 10 and 8% larger AoD than NT individuals, respectively (all P < 0.05). In both sexes, after indexing to BSA, only ISH individuals exhibited larger AoD compared with NT individuals (both P < 0.05). But, with further adjustment for age, these differences were no longer observed. CONCLUSIONS: Even when the subtypes of hypertension are examined separately, age and BSA, not hypertension status, account for the AoD differences between NT and hypertensive subjects.
Authors: C H Chen; C T Ting; S J Lin; T L Hsu; S J Ho; P Chou; M S Chang; F O'Connor; H Spurgeon; E Lakatta; F C Yin Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-08-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jennifer S Drukteinis; Mary J Roman; Richard R Fabsitz; Elisa T Lee; Lyle G Best; Marie Russell; Richard B Devereux Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R Virmani; A P Avolio; W J Mergner; M Robinowitz; E E Herderick; J F Cornhill; S Y Guo; T H Liu; D Y Ou; M O'Rourke Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Jimeng Sun; Candace D McNaughton; Ping Zhang; Adam Perer; Aris Gkoulalas-Divanis; Joshua C Denny; Jacqueline Kirby; Thomas Lasko; Alexander Saip; Bradley A Malin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Angelo Scuteri; Christopher H Morrell; Marco Orrù; James B Strait; Kirill V Tarasov; Liana Anna Pina Ferreli; Francesco Loi; Maria Grazia Pilia; Alessandro Delitala; Harold Spurgeon; Samer S Najjar; Majd AlGhatrif; Edward G Lakatta Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 10.190