Literature DB >> 8611279

Echocardiographic reference values for aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study.

R S Vasan1, M G Larson, E J Benjamin, D Levy.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to develop sex-, age-, and body size-specific nomograms and partition values for upper and lower limits of M-mode echocardiographic aortic root measurements derived from a large population-based cohort. The study sample consisted of 1433 male and 1816 female participants in the Framingham Heart Study and Framingham Offspring Study who were normotensive and free of clinically apparent heart disease at the baseline examination. Aortic root measurements were obtained by M-mode echocardiography by a leading-edge to leading-edge technique. The relations of age and measures of body size with aortic root dimensions were evaluated with sex-specific correlations and multiple stepwise linear regression analyses. Age was the most important determinant of aortic root size in both men and women in the multivariable regression models. Models with age and body surface area yielded R2 values of 0.214 in men and 0.222 in women. Models with age and height yielded lower R2 values of 0.136 in men and 0.181 in women. Thus aortic root dimensions vary widely with the age, sex, and body size of individuals. Sex-specific reference nomograms of aortic root dimensions in relation to age and body size (body surface area or height) are presented to facilitate the detection of abnormalities of aortic root size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8611279     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(05)80003-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  24 in total

1.  Normal limits in relation to age, body size and gender of two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in persons ≥15 years of age.

Authors:  Richard B Devereux; Giovanni de Simone; Donna K Arnett; Lyle G Best; Eric Boerwinkle; Barbara V Howard; Dalane Kitzman; Elisa T Lee; Thomas H Mosley; Alan Weder; Mary J Roman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Postoperative pulmonary and aortic 3D haemodynamics in patients after repair of transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Julia Geiger; Daniel Hirtler; Jonas Bürk; Brigitte Stiller; Raoul Arnold; Bernd Jung; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [A structured report data set for documentation of echocardiographic studies--Update 2004].

Authors:  W Voelker
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-12

Review 4.  Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Measures of Cardiac Remodeling in the Community.

Authors:  Ramachandran S Vasan; Elman Martin Urbina; Ling Jin; Vanessa Xanthakis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Larger ascending aorta in primary aldosteronism: a 3-year prospective evaluation of adrenalectomy vs. medical treatment.

Authors:  Guido Zavatta; Guido Di Dalmazi; Carmine Pizzi; Giovanni Bracchetti; Cristina Mosconi; Caterina Balacchi; Uberto Pagotto; Valentina Vicennati
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Aortic aneurysmal disease and cutis laxa caused by defects in the elastin gene.

Authors:  Z Szabo; M W Crepeau; A L Mitchell; M J Stephan; R A Puntel; K Yin Loke; R C Kirk; Z Urban
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Adult echocardiographic nomograms: overview, critical review and creation of a software for automatic, fast and easy calculation of normal values.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cantinotti; Raffaele Giordano; Marco Paterni; Daniel Saura; Marco Scalese; Eliana Franchi; Nadia Assanta; Martin Koestenberg; Raluca Dulgheru; Tadafumi Sugimoto; Anne Bernard; Luis Caballero; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Multimodality imaging assessment of bicuspid aortic valve disease, thoracic aortic ectasia, and thoracic aortic aneurysmal disease.

Authors:  Preethi Mani; Reza Reyaldeen; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

9.  Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the Framingham Heart Study).

Authors:  Ian S Rogers; Joseph M Massaro; Quynh A Truong; Amir A Mahabadi; Matthias F Kriegel; Caroline S Fox; George Thanassoulis; Eric M Isselbacher; Udo Hoffmann; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Proximal thoracic aortic diameters: transesophageal-echocardiography- versus computed-tomography-derived measurements.

Authors:  Prachi P Agarwal; Peter S Liu; Peter Hagan; Anna M Booher; Kuanwong Watcharotone; Leslie E Quint
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 1.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.