Literature DB >> 18426868

What happened to smokers' beliefs about light cigarettes when "light/mild" brand descriptors were banned in the UK? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

R Borland1, G T Fong, H-H Yong, K M Cummings, D Hammond, B King, M Siahpush, A McNeill, G Hastings, R J O'Connor, T Elton-Marshall, M P Zanna.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper examines how beliefs of smokers in the UK were affected by the removal of "light" and "mild" brand descriptors, which came into effect on 30 September 2003 for Member States of the European Union (EU). PARTICIPANTS: The data come from the first four waves (2002-2005) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Four-Country Survey, an annual cohort telephone survey of adult smokers in Canada, USA, UK and Australia (15 450 individual cases).
DESIGN: The UK ban on misleading descriptors occurred around the second wave of data collection in the ITC survey, permitting us to compare beliefs about light cigarettes among adult smokers in the UK before and after the ban, with beliefs in the three other ITC countries unaffected by the ban.
RESULTS: There was a substantial decline in reported beliefs about the benefits of light cigarettes in the UK following the policy change and an associated public information campaign, but by 2005 (ie, wave 4), these beliefs rebounded slightly and the change in beliefs was no greater than in the USA, where there was no policy change.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal that high levels of misperceptions about light cigarettes existed among smokers in all four countries before and after the EU ban took effect. We cannot conclude that the policy of removing some aspects of misleading labels has been effective in changing beliefs about light cigarettes. Efforts to correct decades of consumer misperceptions about light cigarettes must extend beyond simply removing "light" and "mild" brand descriptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426868      PMCID: PMC4658347          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.023812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  15 in total

1.  Beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; J L Pillitteri
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation.

Authors:  James A Hanley; Abdissa Negassa; Michael D deB Edwardes; Janet E Forrester
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project.

Authors:  G T Fong; K M Cummings; R Borland; G Hastings; A Hyland; G A Giovino; D Hammond; M E Thompson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Smoking topography, brand switching, and nicotine delivery: results from an in vivo study.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  What was "light" and "mild" is now "smooth" and "fine": new labelling of Australian cigarettes.

Authors:  B King; R Borland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Use of and beliefs about light cigarettes in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey.

Authors:  Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Bill King; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Tara Elton-Marshall; David Hammond; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Smokers' responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced-exposure tobacco products.

Authors:  William L Hamilton; Giulia diStefano Norton; Tammy K Ouellette; Wiliam M Rhodes; Ryan Kling; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  What do Marlboro Lights smokers know about low-tar cigarettes?

Authors:  K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland; Maansi A Bansal; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; M E Goldberg; B A Yost; E L White; C T Sweeney; J L Pillitteri
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  40 in total

1.  Do smokers in Europe think all cigarettes are equally harmful?

Authors:  Abraham Brown; Ann McNeill; Ute Mons; Romain Guignard
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Cigarette characteristic and emission variations across high-, middle- and low-income countries.

Authors:  R J O'Connor; K J Wilkins; R V Caruso; K M Cummings; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  Individualized versus population-based approaches to tobacco control - a false dichotomy.

Authors:  K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers: research achievements and future implications.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; C Anderson Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Raymond Niaura; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Awareness of FDA-mandated cigarette packaging changes among smokers of 'light' cigarettes.

Authors:  M Falcone; M Bansal-Travers; P M Sanborn; K Z Tang; A A Strasser
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-12-08

6.  Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Particia Sosa; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Population use, sales, and design: a multidimensional assessment of "light" cigarettes in the United States, 2009.

Authors:  Ilan Behm; Natasha A Sokol; Ryan David Kennedy; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S.

Authors:  Maansi Bansal-Travers; David Hammond; Philip Smith; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Beliefs about the relative harm of "light" and "low tar" cigarettes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey.

Authors:  T Elton-Marshall; G T Fong; M P Zanna; Y Jiang; D Hammond; R J O'Connor; H-H Yong; L Li; B King; Q Li; R Borland; K M Cummings; P Driezen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Misperceptions of "light" cigarettes abound: national survey data.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Deepa Weerasekera; Jo Peace; Richard Edwards; George Thomson; Miranda Devlin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.