AIM: This paper examines how beliefs of smokers in the UK were affected by the removal of "light" and "mild" brand descriptors, which came into effect on 30 September 2003 for Member States of the European Union (EU). PARTICIPANTS: The data come from the first four waves (2002-2005) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Four-Country Survey, an annual cohort telephone survey of adult smokers in Canada, USA, UK and Australia (15 450 individual cases). DESIGN: The UK ban on misleading descriptors occurred around the second wave of data collection in the ITC survey, permitting us to compare beliefs about light cigarettes among adult smokers in the UK before and after the ban, with beliefs in the three other ITC countries unaffected by the ban. RESULTS: There was a substantial decline in reported beliefs about the benefits of light cigarettes in the UK following the policy change and an associated public information campaign, but by 2005 (ie, wave 4), these beliefs rebounded slightly and the change in beliefs was no greater than in the USA, where there was no policy change. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal that high levels of misperceptions about light cigarettes existed among smokers in all four countries before and after the EU ban took effect. We cannot conclude that the policy of removing some aspects of misleading labels has been effective in changing beliefs about light cigarettes. Efforts to correct decades of consumer misperceptions about light cigarettes must extend beyond simply removing "light" and "mild" brand descriptors.
AIM: This paper examines how beliefs of smokers in the UK were affected by the removal of "light" and "mild" brand descriptors, which came into effect on 30 September 2003 for Member States of the European Union (EU). PARTICIPANTS: The data come from the first four waves (2002-2005) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Four-Country Survey, an annual cohort telephone survey of adult smokers in Canada, USA, UK and Australia (15 450 individual cases). DESIGN: The UK ban on misleading descriptors occurred around the second wave of data collection in the ITC survey, permitting us to compare beliefs about light cigarettes among adult smokers in the UK before and after the ban, with beliefs in the three other ITC countries unaffected by the ban. RESULTS: There was a substantial decline in reported beliefs about the benefits of light cigarettes in the UK following the policy change and an associated public information campaign, but by 2005 (ie, wave 4), these beliefs rebounded slightly and the change in beliefs was no greater than in the USA, where there was no policy change. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal that high levels of misperceptions about light cigarettes existed among smokers in all four countries before and after the EU ban took effect. We cannot conclude that the policy of removing some aspects of misleading labels has been effective in changing beliefs about light cigarettes. Efforts to correct decades of consumer misperceptions about light cigarettes must extend beyond simply removing "light" and "mild" brand descriptors.
Authors: G T Fong; K M Cummings; R Borland; G Hastings; A Hyland; G A Giovino; D Hammond; M E Thompson Journal: Tob Control Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Bill King; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Tara Elton-Marshall; David Hammond; Ann McNeill Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: William L Hamilton; Giulia diStefano Norton; Tammy K Ouellette; Wiliam M Rhodes; Ryan Kling; Gregory N Connolly Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Timothy B Baker; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; C Anderson Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Raymond Niaura; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-07-24 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ilan Behm; Natasha A Sokol; Ryan David Kennedy; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: T Elton-Marshall; G T Fong; M P Zanna; Y Jiang; D Hammond; R J O'Connor; H-H Yong; L Li; B King; Q Li; R Borland; K M Cummings; P Driezen Journal: Tob Control Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Nick Wilson; Deepa Weerasekera; Jo Peace; Richard Edwards; George Thomson; Miranda Devlin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 3.295