Literature DB >> 22294783

Do smokers in Europe think all cigarettes are equally harmful?

Abraham Brown1, Ann McNeill, Ute Mons, Romain Guignard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the ban on misleading descriptors such as light or mild cigarettes in Europe, there are still widespread misperceptions of the relative harmfulness of different brands of cigarettes among smokers. This study examined the extent to which smokers in three European countries believed that some cigarette brands are less harmful and why, using data from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe surveys.
METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses were completed among nationally representative samples of 4,956 current smokers (aged ≥ 18) from Germany (n = 1,515), France (n = 1,735) and the United Kingdom (n = 1,706) conducted between September 2006 and November 2007. Logistic regression models examined whether outcomes, including beliefs that some cigarettes could be less harmful than others, varied by socio-demographic and country of residence.
FINDINGS: Around a quarter of smokers in the UK and France, and a third in Germany believed some cigarettes are less harmful than others. Overall, of smokers who falsely believed that some cigarettes are less harmful, 86.3% thought that tar/nicotine yields, 48.7% taste, and 40.4% terms on packs such as 'smooth' or 'ultra' indicated less harmful brands. About a fifth of smokers across all countries chose their brand based on health reasons, and a similar proportion gave tar yields as a reason for choosing brands.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research suggests that the current European Tobacco Products Directive is inadequate in eliminating misperceptions about the relative risk of brand descriptors on cigarettes. There is therefore an urgent need to protect smokers in Europe from these misperceptions via stronger measures such as plain packaging regulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294783      PMCID: PMC3269294          DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  25 in total

1.  The effect of plain packaging on response to health warnings.

Authors:  M E Goldberg; J Liefeld; J Madill; H Vredenburg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; J L Pillitteri
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact.

Authors:  R W Pollay; T Dewhirst
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Does tobacco industry marketing of 'light' cigarettes give smokers a rationale for postponing quitting?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gilpin; Sherry Emery; Martha M White; John P Pierce
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Use of and beliefs about light cigarettes in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey.

Authors:  Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Bill King; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Tara Elton-Marshall; David Hammond; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Smokers' responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced-exposure tobacco products.

Authors:  William L Hamilton; Giulia diStefano Norton; Tammy K Ouellette; Wiliam M Rhodes; Ryan Kling; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Smokers' knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: health policy implications.

Authors:  J B Cohen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Similar uptake of lung carcinogens by smokers of regular, light, and ultralight cigarettes.

Authors:  Stephen S Hecht; Sharon E Murphy; Steven G Carmella; Shelby Li; Joni Jensen; Chap Le; Anne M Joseph; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Impact of the removal of misleading terms on cigarette pack on smokers' beliefs about 'light/mild' cigarettes: cross-country comparisons.

Authors:  Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; Richard J O'Connor; Gerard Hastings; Bill King
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  The effect of plain packages on the perception of cigarette health warnings.

Authors:  P Beede; R Lawson
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.427

View more
  11 in total

1.  Population use, sales, and design: a multidimensional assessment of "light" cigarettes in the United States, 2009.

Authors:  Ilan Behm; Natasha A Sokol; Ryan David Kennedy; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Lung cancer in women: an overview with special focus on Spanish women.

Authors:  J Remon; E Molina-Montes; M Majem; P Lianes; D Isla; P Garrido; E Felip; N Viñolas; J de Castro; A Artal; M-J Sánchez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Testing a Brief Web-based Intervention to Increase Recognition of Tobacco Constituents.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Klein; Amanda J Quisenberry; Abigail B Shoben; Tiffany Thomson; SuSandi Htut; Randi E Foraker; Albert M Lai; Michael D Slater
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-11

4.  Australian adult smokers' responses to plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings 1 year after implementation: results from a national cross-sectional tracking survey.

Authors:  Melanie Wakefield; Kerri Coomber; Meghan Zacher; Sarah Durkin; Emily Brennan; Michelle Scollo
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Use of flavoured cigarettes in Poland: data from the global adult tobacco survey (2009-2010).

Authors:  Dorota Kaleta; Bukola Usidame; Anna Szosland-Fałtyn; Teresa Makowiec-Dąbrowska
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Plain packaging of cigarettes: do we have sufficient evidence?

Authors:  Collin N Smith; John D Kraemer; Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-04-02

7.  Perceived Relative Harm of Selected Cigarettes and Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products-A Study of Young People from a Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Rural Area in Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Kaleta; Kinga Polanska; Leokadia Bak-Romaniszyn; Piotr Wojtysiak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Flemish adolescents' perceptions of cigarette plain packaging: a qualitative study with focus group discussions.

Authors:  Guido Van Hal; Sofie Van Roosbroeck; Bart Vriesacker; Matheus Arts; Sarah Hoeck; Jessica Fraeyman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Impact of the removal of light and mild descriptors from cigarette packages in Ontario, Canada: switching to "light replacement" brand variants.

Authors:  Joanna E Cohen; Jingyan Yang; Elisabeth A Donaldson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Correlates of cessation success among Romanian adults.

Authors:  Dorota Kaleta; Bukola Usidame; Elżbieta Dziankowska-Zaborszczyk; Teresa Makowiec-Dąbrowska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.