Literature DB >> 18426770

Rate constants rather than biochemical mechanism determine behaviour of genetic clocks.

Emery Conrad1, Avraham E Mayo, Alexander J Ninfa, Daniel B Forger.   

Abstract

Many biological systems contain both positive and negative feedbacks. These are often classified as resonators or integrators. Resonators respond preferentially to oscillating signals of a particular frequency. Integrators, on the other hand, accumulate a response to signals. Computational neuroscientists often refer to neurons showing integrator properties as type I neurons and those showing resonator properties as type II neurons. Guantes & Poyatos have shown that type I or type II behaviour can be seen in genetic clocks. They argue that when negative feedback occurs through transcription regulation and post-translationally, genetic clocks act as integrators and resonators, respectively. Here we show that either behaviour can be seen with either design and in a wide range of genetic clocks. This highlights the importance of parameters rather than biochemical mechanism in determining the system behaviour.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426770      PMCID: PMC2706451          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0046.focus

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  16 in total

Review 1.  Molecular interaction map of the mammalian cell cycle control and DNA repair systems.

Authors:  K W Kohn
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Time zones: a comparative genetics of circadian clocks.

Authors:  M W Young; S A Kay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The influence of limit cycle topology on the phase resetting curve.

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan; Carmen C Canavier
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Development of genetic circuitry exhibiting toggle switch or oscillatory behavior in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mariette R Atkinson; Michael A Savageau; Jesse T Myers; Alexander J Ninfa
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A simple model of circadian rhythms based on dimerization and proteolysis of PER and TIM.

Authors:  J J Tyson; C I Hong; C D Thron; B Novak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Interlinked fast and slow positive feedback loops drive reliable cell decisions.

Authors:  Onn Brandman; James E Ferrell; Rong Li; Tobias Meyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A model of phosphofructokinase and glycolytic oscillations in the pancreatic beta-cell.

Authors:  Pål O Westermark; Anders Lansner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Oscillatory expression of the bHLH factor Hes1 regulated by a negative feedback loop.

Authors:  Hiromi Hirata; Shigeki Yoshiura; Toshiyuki Ohtsuka; Yasumasa Bessho; Takahiro Harada; Kenichi Yoshikawa; Ryoichiro Kageyama
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dynamical principles of two-component genetic oscillators.

Authors:  Raúl Guantes; Juan F Poyatos
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  A comparative analysis of synthetic genetic oscillators.

Authors:  Oliver Purcell; Nigel J Savery; Claire S Grierson; Mario di Bernardo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Influence of parameter values on the oscillation sensitivities of two p53-Mdm2 models.

Authors:  Christian E Cuba; Alexander R Valle; Giancarlo Ayala-Charca; Elizabeth R Villota; Alberto M Coronado
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2015-06-05

3.  Biological switches and clocks.

Authors:  John J Tyson; Reka Albert; Albert Goldbeter; Peter Ruoff; Jill Sible
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  A delay model for noise-induced bi-directional switching.

Authors:  Jinzhi Lei; Guowei He; Haoping Liu; Qing Nie
Journal:  Nonlinearity       Date:  2009-12

5.  Avoiding transcription factor competition at promoter level increases the chances of obtaining oscillation.

Authors:  Andreea Munteanu; Marco Constante; Mark Isalan; Ricard V Solé
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-05-17

6.  Velocity response curves demonstrate the complexity of modeling entrainable clocks.

Authors:  Stephanie R Taylor; Allyson Cheever; Sarah M Harmon
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 7.  Circadian rhythms and the HPA axis: A systems view.

Authors:  Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  WIREs Mech Dis       Date:  2021-01-12

8.  A gene regulatory motif that generates oscillatory or multiway switch outputs.

Authors:  Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths; Karen M Page; James Briscoe
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Specialized or flexible feed-forward loop motifs: a question of topology.

Authors:  Javier Macía; Stefanie Widder; Ricard Solé
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2009-08-31

10.  Tuning genetic clocks employing DNA binding sites.

Authors:  Shridhar Jayanthi; Domitilla Del Vecchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.