Literature DB >> 26279702

Influence of parameter values on the oscillation sensitivities of two p53-Mdm2 models.

Christian E Cuba1, Alexander R Valle1, Giancarlo Ayala-Charca1, Elizabeth R Villota1, Alberto M Coronado1.   

Abstract

Biomolecular networks that present oscillatory behavior are ubiquitous in nature. While some design principles for robust oscillations have been identified, it is not well understood how these oscillations are affected when the kinetic parameters are constantly changing or are not precisely known, as often occurs in cellular environments. Many models of diverse complexity level, for systems such as circadian rhythms, cell cycle or the p53 network, have been proposed. Here we assess the influence of hundreds of different parameter sets on the sensitivities of two configurations of a well-known oscillatory system, the p53 core network. We show that, for both models and all parameter sets, the parameter related to the p53 positive feedback, i.e. self-promotion, is the only one that presents sizeable sensitivities on extrema, periods and delay. Moreover, varying the parameter set values to change the dynamical characteristics of the response is more restricted in the simple model, whereas the complex model shows greater tunability. These results highlight the importance of the presence of specific network patterns, in addition to the role of parameter values, when we want to characterize oscillatory biochemical systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global sensitivity; Oscillatory systems; P53 network

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279702      PMCID: PMC4531880          DOI: 10.1007/s11693-015-9173-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Synth Biol        ISSN: 1872-5325


  34 in total

1.  Sensitivity analysis of stoichiometric networks: an extension of metabolic control analysis to non-steady state trajectories.

Authors:  Brian P Ingalls; Herbert M Sauro
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Oscillations and temporal signalling in cells.

Authors:  G Tiana; S Krishna; S Pigolotti; M H Jensen; K Sneppen
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Signaling to p53: breaking the MDM2-p53 circuit.

Authors:  C Prives
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Diversity in the dynamical behaviour of a compartmentalized programmable biochemical oscillator.

Authors:  Maximilian Weitz; Jongmin Kim; Korbinian Kapsner; Erik Winfree; Elisa Franco; Friedrich C Simmel
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 5.  Design principles of biochemical oscillators.

Authors:  Béla Novák; John J Tyson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  The P53 pathway: what questions remain to be explored?

Authors:  A J Levine; W Hu; Z Feng
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 15.828

7.  Synthetic in vitro transcriptional oscillators.

Authors:  Jongmin Kim; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Oscillations and variability in the p53 system.

Authors:  Naama Geva-Zatorsky; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Shalev Itzkovitz; Ron Milo; Alex Sigal; Erez Dekel; Talia Yarnitzky; Yuvalal Liron; Paz Polak; Galit Lahav; Uri Alon
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  The Per2 negative feedback loop sets the period in the mammalian circadian clock mechanism.

Authors:  A Katharina Wilkins; Paul I Barton; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator.

Authors:  Jesse Stricker; Scott Cookson; Matthew R Bennett; William H Mather; Lev S Tsimring; Jeff Hasty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.