Literature DB >> 18426309

Memory without awareness: pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching to sample.

Jennifer E Sutton1, Sara J Shettleworth.   

Abstract

Metamemory, the ability to report on memory strength, is clearly established in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) by converging evidence from several paradigms. In contrast, A. Inman and S. J. Shettleworth (1999) found no conclusive evidence of metamemory in pigeons. The authors studied pigeons further in 3 paradigms, with multiple tests of metamemory in each. Pigeons encountered a safe alternative to a matching-to-sample test either before (Experiment 2) or concurrently with (Experiment 3) the matching test. Choices of the safe option did not vary consistently with matching accuracy or change in trials with omitted samples in the way predicted for an animal with metamemory. In Experiment 4, confidence ratings following completion of the matching test also did not vary consistently as predicted by metamemory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426309     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.2.266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  38 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 2.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Metacognition in monkeys during an oculomotor task.

Authors:  Paul G Middlebrooks; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.

Authors:  Allison Adams; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Ants adjust their pheromone deposition to a changing environment and their probability of making errors.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Sara E Futch; J David Smith; Theodore A Evans; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

Review 8.  Do actions speak louder than words? A comparative perspective on implicit versus explicit meta-cognition and theory of mind.

Authors:  Justin J Couchman; Michael J Beran; Mariana V C Coutinho; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria Zakrzewski; Barbara Church; J David Smith
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-10-19

Review 9.  Consciousness in dolphins? A review of recent evidence.

Authors:  Heidi E Harley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.