Literature DB >> 18423724

Waiting time from initial urological consultation to nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma--does it affect survival?

Andrew A Stec1, Benjamin J Coons, Sam S Chang, Michael S Cookson, S Duke Herrell, Joseph A Smith, Peter E Clark.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report survival and recurrence outcomes in all patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, as related to surgical waiting time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 722 patients who underwent surgical resection for renal cell carcinoma. Patients were subdivided by waiting time from the initial urology visit until surgery. Surgical waiting time was evaluated as a continuous variable and by monthly subgroups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with overall, disease specific and recurrence-free survival.
RESULTS: Mean time from the first visit to surgery was 1.2 months with 64.1% and 94.3% of patients undergoing surgery within 30 days and within 3 months, respectively. Overall and disease specific survival was not affected by surgical waiting time regardless of how time was analyzed. On univariate analysis 5-year recurrence-free survival was poorer in patients undergoing surgery within 1 month vs more than 1 month (75.7% vs 88.4%, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis T stage (p <0.0001), grade (p = 0.009), lymph node involvement (p = 0.0001) and histology (p = 0.006) were independent predictors of recurrence-free survival, while surgical waiting time was not (p = 0.18). Surgical waiting time less than 1 month was associated with higher stage and higher grade tumors (p <0.0001 and 0.0006, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical waiting time from initial urological consultation to operative intervention does not adversely affect the outcome of renal cell carcinoma within the time frames analyzed in this study, in which 94% of cases occurred within 3 months. Individual urologist judgment remains a critical factor in the appropriate and timely care of the patient with a suspicious renal mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423724      PMCID: PMC2953870          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a multicenter European study.

Authors:  Luca Cindolo; Jean-Jacques Patard; Paolo Chiodini; Luigi Schips; Vincenzo Ficarra; Jacques Tostain; Alexandre de La Taille; Vincenzo Altieri; Bernard Lobel; Richard E Zigeuner; Walter Artibani; François Guillé; Claude C Abbou; Luigi Salzano; Ciro Gallo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention.

Authors:  Erik Kouba; Angela Smith; Daniel McRackan; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Won-Ho Park; Tim Eisen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  Does prolonging the time to renal cancer surgery affect long-term cancer control: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael Jewett; Ricardo Rendon; George Dranitsaris; Darrel Drachenberg; Simon Tanguay; Bryan Donnelly; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.344

5.  A snapshot of waiting times for cancer surgery provided by surgeons affiliated with regional cancer centres in Ontario.

Authors:  M Simunovic; A Gagliardi; D McCready; A Coates; M Levine; D DePetrillo
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Growth characteristics of renal cortical tumors in patients managed by watchful waiting.

Authors:  Richard D Sowery; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.344

7.  Natural history of renal masses followed expectantly.

Authors:  W Kassouf; A G Aprikian; M Laplante; S Tanguay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Does a delay in initiating definitive therapy affect biochemical recurrence rates in men with clinically localized prostate cancer?

Authors:  Joseph J Phillips; M Craig Hall; W Robert Lee; Peter E Clark
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Significance of the time period between diagnosis of muscle invasion and radical cystectomy with regard to the prognosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium in the bladder.

Authors:  M May; T Nitzke; C Helke; H Vogler; B Hoschke
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004

10.  How will the two-weeks-wait rule affect delays in management of urological cancers?

Authors:  K R Subramonian; S Puranik; G R Mufti
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  11 in total

1.  The impact of delaying radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  How long can patients with renal cell carcinoma wait for surgery without compromising pathological outcomes?

Authors:  Carlos H Martínez; Paul Martin; Venu Chalasani; Andrew K Williams; Patrick P W Luke; Jonathan I Izawa; Joseph L Chin; Larry Stitt; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  High resolution analysis of wait times and factors affecting surgical expediency.

Authors:  Eric Cole; Wilma Hopman; Jun Kawakami
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Focal therapy for kidney cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; David A Kunkle; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  The effect of delaying nephrectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients with renal tumors greater than 4cm.

Authors:  Roy Mano; Emily A Vertosick; Abraham Ari Hakimi; Itay A Sternberg; Daniel D Sjoberg; Melanie Bernstein; Guido Dalbagni; Jonathan A Coleman; Paul Russo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Nephrectomy Delay of More than 10 Weeks from Diagnosis Is Associated with Decreased Overall Survival in pT3 RCC.

Authors:  Jiping Zeng; Ken Batai; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  J Kidney Cancer VHL       Date:  2021-06-14

7.  Longer waiting times for early stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy are associated with diminished long-term overall survival.

Authors:  Kulisara Nanthamongkolkul; Jitti Hanprasertpong
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Wait times from diagnosis to treatment in cancer.

Authors:  Laurie Elit
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  Risks from Deferring Treatment for Genitourinary Cancers: A Collaborative Review to Aid Triage and Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; Giacomo Novara; Laura Marandino; Axel Bex; Ashish M Kamat; R Jeffrey Karnes; Todd M Morgan; Nicolas Mottet; Silke Gillessen; Alberto Bossi; Morgan Roupret; Thomas Powles; Andrea Necchi; James W F Catto; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Delaying surgery for clinical T1b-T2bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: Oncologic implications in the COVID-19 era and beyond.

Authors:  Arnav Srivastava; Hiren V Patel; Sinae Kim; Brian Shinder; Joshua Sterling; Alexandra L Tabakin; Charles F Polotti; Biren Saraiya; Tina Mayer; Isaac Y Kim; Saum Ghodoussipour; Hiten D Patel; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.