Literature DB >> 17222611

Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention.

Erik Kouba1, Angela Smith, Daniel McRackan, Eric M Wallen, Raj S Pruthi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe the short-term outcomes of patients whose renal masses were managed expectantly (ie watchful waiting) to provide insight into the natural history of small renal tumors. Additionally, this study examined the effects of delayed intervention in patients who required intervention after a period of expectant management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients with 46 renal masses underwent planned expectant management of enhancing solid or cystic (Bosniak IV) renal masses. A subset of these patients (13) who underwent eventual intervention was also examined. Outcomes with regard to age, gender, growth rate, subsequent interventions and clinical followup are reported.
RESULTS: At a mean followup of 36 months 74% of patients had tumor growth with a mean (median) growth rate of 0.70 (0.35) cm per year. None of the patients had significant symptoms, disease progression or cancer specific death. There were 4 patients (10%) who died of other causes. The 13 patients undergoing eventual intervention were younger than those who did not undergo intervention (56 vs 72 years, respectively, p = 0.0006). Patients undergoing eventual intervention tended to have a higher tumor growth rate than those on continued observation (0.90 vs 0.61 cm per year, respectively, p = 0.1486). In patients undergoing eventual intervention 12 of 14 (87%) tumors were renal cell carcinoma. All were stage pT1, and 12 of 13 patients were alive after a mean followup of 41 months (1 patient died of other causes 30 months after surgery). No patient had up-staging of disease secondary to delay.
CONCLUSIONS: Watchful waiting for renal masses is a reasonable option for appropriately selected patients, especially those with competing comorbidities. Delayed intervention does not appear to adversely impact pathological outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17222611     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  40 in total

1.  Renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidental renal tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Debra A Gervais; Rebecca I Hartman; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Adam S Feldman; Peter R Mueller; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR classification of renal masses with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Ivan Pedrosa; Mary T Chou; Long Ngo; Ronaldo H Baroni; Elizabeth M Genega; Laura Galaburda; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Renal cell carcinoma--developments in therapy].

Authors:  M Marberger; G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses : A retrospective, single center data analysis].

Authors:  O Heißler; S Seklehner; H Fellner; P F Engelhardt; A Chemelli; C Riedl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Pathological characteristics and radiographic correlates of complex renal cysts.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Pamela T Johnson; Michael A Gorin; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf; Elliot K Fishman; George J Netto; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  [Active surveillance: concept for renal cell carcinoma?].

Authors:  I Tsaur; D Schilling; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Thermal Ablation of Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques and Results.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Felix Chun
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Brian L Egleston; Yu-Ning Wong; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The current role of renal biopsy in the management of localized renal tumors.

Authors:  Gagan Gautam; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

10.  Watchful waiting in the treatment of the small renal mass.

Authors:  K Clint Cary; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.