Literature DB >> 15204377

Significance of the time period between diagnosis of muscle invasion and radical cystectomy with regard to the prognosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium in the bladder.

M May1, T Nitzke, C Helke, H Vogler, B Hoschke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Standard treatment of muscle-infiltrated transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium consists of radical cystectomy. In some cases there is a delay between the initial diagnosis and a definitive treatment being administered. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the time window between evidence of muscle invasion and radical cystectomy on the pathological stage and progression-free survival.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February 1992 and August 2002, 239 radical cystectomies were carried out as a result of TCC of the bladder. In a total of 189 patients (79%), cystectomy was carried out due to muscle-infiltrated TCC with no evidence of distant metastases (>/=T2, M0). The time between the diagnosis of muscle invasion and cystectomy was determined for all of these patients, who were then divided into two groups on the basis of a 3-month cut-off period. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the effect of the time period on clinical factors and progression-free survival.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 63 (range 35-80) years. A median follow-up of 40 months showed a progression-free survival rate of 49% after 5 years. The average time between the diagnosis of muscle invasion and cystectomy was 1.8 (0.3-12.1) months. For a time window of >3 months, 30/42 patients (72%) showed signs of extravesical tumor growth and/or tumor-positive lymph nodes, compared to 89/147 patients (60%) (p = 0.198) for a time window of </=3 months. In terms of the distribution of tumor stages according to the time groups, there were significantly more pT4 stage tumors in patients with delayed cystectomy (p = 0.009). Patients with a time interval of </=3 months between diagnosis of muscle invasion and cystectomy had a significantly better progression-free survival rate (55%) than those with a longer time window (34%) (p = 0.04). In contrast to lymph node status, clinical stage, pathological tumor stage and differentiation level, the prognostic relevance of the time window fell just short of the significance level in Cox's multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.057). Lymph node status (p < 0.001) and pathological tumor stage (p = 0.05) were the only independent prognostic parameters which could be used to predict progression-free survival.
CONCLUSION: Patients with a time window of >3 months between diagnosis of muscle invasion and radical cystectomy were associated with an advanced pathological stage and a poorer progression-free survival. These results underline the need for early cystectomy within the 3-month period between diagnosis of muscle invasion and cystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204377     DOI: 10.1080/00365590410029141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  23 in total

1.  [Patients with bladder cancer in clinical stage T2 : survival benefit of downstaging in comparison to patients with confirmed muscle invasion in cystectomy specimens].

Authors:  M May; H-M Fritsche; S Brookman-May; M Burger; C Bolenz; L Trojan; E Herrmann; M S Michel; C Wülfing; A Tiemann; S C Müller; J Ellinger; A Buchner; C G Stief; D Tilki; W F Wieland; C Gilfrich; T Höfner; M Hohenfellner; A Haferkamp; J Roigas; M Zacharias; S Gunia; P J Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Management of carcinoma in situ of the bladder: best practice and recent developments.

Authors:  Dominic H Tang; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

3.  Clinical trials: nationally representative data in urology.

Authors:  Jay B Shah; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Gender-dependent cancer-specific survival following radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Matthias May; Christian Stief; Sabine Brookman-May; Wolfgang Otto; Christian Gilfrich; Jan Roigas; Mario Zacharias; Wolf F Wieland; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Ferdinand Hofstädter; Maximilian Burger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Urologist referral delay and its impact on survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  F Santos; A Dragomir; W Kassouf; E Franco; A Aprikian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Variations in reconstruction after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  John L Gore; Christopher S Saigal; Jan M Hanley; Matthias Schonlau; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: impact of time to surgery.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Robert S Svatek; Vitaly Margulis; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin; Colin P Dinney; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Mortality increases when radical cystectomy is delayed more than 12 weeks: results from a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare analysis.

Authors:  John L Gore; Julie Lai; Claude M Setodji; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Waiting time from initial urological consultation to nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma--does it affect survival?

Authors:  Andrew A Stec; Benjamin J Coons; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Impact of treatment delay in patients with bladder cancer managed with partial cystectomy in Quebec: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nader Fahmy; Armen Aprikian; Mohammed Al-Otaibi; Simon Tanguay; Jordan Steinberg; Suganthiny Jeyaganth; Moamen Amin; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.