Literature DB >> 12893857

How will the two-weeks-wait rule affect delays in management of urological cancers?

K R Subramonian1, S Puranik, G R Mufti.   

Abstract

The UK National Health Service has now specified a maximum interval of two weeks between general practitioner (GP) referral and specialist assessment for patients with suspected cancer. We examined progress through the cancer pathway in 160 patients with potentially curable cancers of the prostate, bladder, kidney and testis before implementation of this rule. Median intervals with interquartile ranges were quantified from the first GP consultation to hospital referral, then to the first hospital consultation, confirmation of diagnosis and definitive surgery. 34% of patients were seen at the hospital within two weeks of referral. The overall median interval from GP consultation to radical surgery was 137 days, the longest being for prostate cancer (median 244). For prostate, bladder and renal cancers the principal element of delay was from the time of diagnosis to surgery (76, 73 and 26 days respectively). These results indicate that, under the two-weeks-wait rule, 2 out of every 3 patients achieve earlier initial assessment. However, the overall delay will not be substantially reduced without concomitant increases in diagnostic facilities, theatre time and human resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12893857      PMCID: PMC539570          DOI: 10.1177/014107680309600809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  13 in total

1.  DELAY IN TREATING BLADDER TUMOURS.

Authors:  D M WALLACE; D L HARRIS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-08-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Prognostic factors in advanced non-seminomatous germ-cell testicular tumours: results of a multicentre study. Report from the Medical Research Council Working Party on Testicular Tumours.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Factors contributing to delay in diagnosis of testicular tumours.

Authors:  R T Oliver
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-02-02

4.  Delays in diagnosing and treating bladder cancer.

Authors:  M J Stower
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-30

5.  Factors involved in diagnostic delay of testicular cancer.

Authors:  C Toklu; H Ozen; A Sahin; M Rastadoskouee; E Erdem
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Delay and survival in bladder cancer.

Authors:  D M A Wallace; R T Bryan; J A Dunn; G Begum; S Bathers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The effect of patient's delay and doctor's delay in patients with malignant germ cell tumours.

Authors:  Sophie Dorothea Fossa; Olbjørn Klepp; Ragna Følling Elgjo; Gunnar Eliassen; Haakon Melsom; Tomas Urnes; Mari Wang
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  1981-03

8.  Patients' delay in the presentation of testis cancer in Ireland.

Authors:  J A Thornhill; J J Fennelly; D G Kelly; A Walsh; J M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1987-05

9.  Survival with bladder cancer, evaluation of delay in treatment, type of surgeon, and modality of treatment.

Authors:  M C Gulliford; A Petruckevitch; P G Burney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-24

10.  Influence of delay in diagnosis on prognosis in testicular teratoma.

Authors:  C E Chilvers; M Saunders; J M Bliss; J Nicholls; A Horwich
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Referral guidelines for suspected central nervous system or brain tumours.

Authors:  A J Larner
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  The impact of delaying radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Wait times in prostate cancer diagnosis and radiation treatment.

Authors:  Christiaan Stevens; Susan J Bondy; D Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Impact of the length of time between diagnosis and surgical removal of urologic neoplasms on survival.

Authors:  Vincent Bourgade; Sarah J Drouin; David R Yates; Jerôme Parra; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Waiting time from initial urological consultation to nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma--does it affect survival?

Authors:  Andrew A Stec; Benjamin J Coons; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Factors associated with time-to-treatment of prostate cancer in Florida.

Authors:  Hong Xiao; Fei Tan; Pierre Goovaerts; Georges Adunlin; Askal Ali; Youjie Huang; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-11

7.  The Waiting Time of Prostate Cancer Patients in Poland.

Authors:  Karolina Osowiecka; Sergiusz Nawrocki; Marcin Kurowicki; Monika Rucinska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The WIRE study a phase II, multi-arm, multi-centre, non-randomised window-of-opportunity clinical trial platform using a Bayesian adaptive design for proof-of-mechanism of novel treatment strategies in operable renal cell cancer - a study protocol.

Authors:  Stephan Ursprung; Helen Mossop; Ferdia A Gallagher; Evis Sala; Richard Skells; Jamal A N Sipple; Thomas J Mitchell; Anita Chhabra; Kate Fife; Athena Matakidou; Gemma Young; Amanda Walker; Martin G Thomas; Mireia Crispin Ortuzar; Mark Sullivan; Andrew Protheroe; Grenville Oades; Balaji Venugopal; Anne Y Warren; John Stone; Tim Eisen; James Wason; Sarah J Welsh; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.