X Li1, J Cui, S P Christopasak, A Kumar, Z-G Peng. 1. Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess radio frequency (RF) artefacts in echoplanar imaging (EPI) induced by two 1.5 T MR scanners in close proximity and to find an effective method to correct them. METHODS: Based on the intact shielding of rooms, experiments were performed by two MR scanners with similar centre frequencies. Phantom A (PA) was scanned in one scanner by EPI at different bandwidths (BWs). Simultaneously, phantom B was scanned in a fixed sequence for scanning with the other scanner. RF artefact gaps of PA, scanning time and the image signal-noise ratio (SNR) were measured and recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with the repeated-measures analysis of variance test. Based on findings obtained from PA, three healthy volunteers were studied at a conventional BW and a lower BW to observe the artefact variance. RESULTS: EPI RF artefacts were symmetrically situated in both sides of the image following the phase-encoding direction. The gap size of the artefact became larger and the SNR was significantly improved with a narrower BW. RF artefacts with a lower BW in volunteers presented the same characteristic as PA. CONCLUSION: For EPI RF artefacts produced by two 1.5 T MR scanners with approximately similar centre frequencies, we can reduce BWs in a suitable range to minimize the effect on MRI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MR scanners with the same field strength installed in the same vicinity might produce RF artefacts in the sequence at larger BWs. Reducing BWs properly is effective to control the position of artefacts and improve the image quality.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess radio frequency (RF) artefacts in echoplanar imaging (EPI) induced by two 1.5 T MR scanners in close proximity and to find an effective method to correct them. METHODS: Based on the intact shielding of rooms, experiments were performed by two MR scanners with similar centre frequencies. Phantom A (PA) was scanned in one scanner by EPI at different bandwidths (BWs). Simultaneously, phantom B was scanned in a fixed sequence for scanning with the other scanner. RF artefact gaps of PA, scanning time and the image signal-noise ratio (SNR) were measured and recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with the repeated-measures analysis of variance test. Based on findings obtained from PA, three healthy volunteers were studied at a conventional BW and a lower BW to observe the artefact variance. RESULTS: EPI RF artefacts were symmetrically situated in both sides of the image following the phase-encoding direction. The gap size of the artefact became larger and the SNR was significantly improved with a narrower BW. RF artefacts with a lower BW in volunteers presented the same characteristic as PA. CONCLUSION: For EPI RF artefacts produced by two 1.5 T MR scanners with approximately similar centre frequencies, we can reduce BWs in a suitable range to minimize the effect on MRI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MR scanners with the same field strength installed in the same vicinity might produce RF artefacts in the sequence at larger BWs. Reducing BWs properly is effective to control the position of artefacts and improve the image quality.
Authors: J H Simon; T H Foster; L Ketonen; S Totterman; J Szumowski; D K Kido; J V Manzione; S E Joy Journal: Radiology Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 11.105