Literature DB >> 18418257

The effects of pitch and pitch strength on an auditory-evoked N1m.

Yoshiharu Soeta1, Seiji Nakagawa.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to determine whether the latency and/or amplitude of the N1m deflection of the auditory-evoked magnetic fields are influenced by the delay and number of iterations of iterated rippled noise, which are related to pitch and pitch strength, respectively. The results indicate that the N1m amplitude decreased sharply for delays between 16 and 32 ms, suggesting that the N1m amplitude reflects the lower limit of the audible pitch range. The N1m latency increases with increasing delay of up to 8-16 ms and then decreases again for delays longer than 16 ms. The behavior of the latency may reflect the balance between the pitch-related component of the N1m and a specific pitch-unrelated component.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18418257     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282fe2085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  5 in total

1.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Language experience enhances early cortical pitch-dependent responses.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  A neurophysiological study into the foundations of tonal harmony.

Authors:  Elika Bergelson; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Cortical pitch response components show differential sensitivity to native and nonnative pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.