Cynthia B Whitman1, Sanatan Shreay, Matthew Gitlin, Martijn G H van Oijen, Brennan M R Spiegel. 1. Departments of Research and, ¶Internal Medicine, Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California;, †University of California at Los Angeles, Veterans Administration Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California;, ‡Global Health Economics, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California;, §Department of Internal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, ‖Department of Health Services, University of California at Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Red blood cell transfusion was previously the principle therapy for anemia in CKD but became less prevalent after the introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. This study used adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis to identify preferences and predictors of transfusion decision-making in CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A computerized adaptive choice-based conjoint survey was administered between June and August of 2012 to nephrologists, internists, and hospitalists listed in the American Medical Association Masterfile. The survey quantified the relative importance of 10 patient attributes, including hemoglobin levels, age, occult blood in stool, severity of illness, eligibility for transplant, iron indices, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, cardiovascular disease, and functional status. Triggers of transfusions in common dialysis scenarios were studied, and based on adaptive choice-based conjoint-derived preferences, relative importance by performing multivariable regression to identify predictors of transfusion preferences was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 350 providers completed the survey (n=305 nephrologists; mean age=46 years; 21% women). Of 10 attributes assessed, absolute hemoglobin level was the most important driver of transfusions, accounting for 29% of decision-making, followed by functional status (16%) and cardiovascular comorbidities (12%); 92% of providers transfused when hemoglobin was 7.5 g/dl, independent of other factors. In multivariable regression, Veterans Administration providers were more likely to transfuse at 8.0 g/dl (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 18.4). Although transplant eligibility explained only 5% of decision-making, nephrologists were five times more likely to value it as important compared with non-nephrologists (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.4 to 11.1). CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis was useful in predicting influences on transfusion decisions. Hemoglobin level, functional status, and cardiovascular comorbidities most strongly influenced transfusion decision-making, but preference variations were observed among subgroups.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Red blood cell transfusion was previously the principle therapy for anemia in CKD but became less prevalent after the introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. This study used adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis to identify preferences and predictors of transfusion decision-making in CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A computerized adaptive choice-based conjoint survey was administered between June and August of 2012 to nephrologists, internists, and hospitalists listed in the American Medical Association Masterfile. The survey quantified the relative importance of 10 patient attributes, including hemoglobin levels, age, occult blood in stool, severity of illness, eligibility for transplant, iron indices, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, cardiovascular disease, and functional status. Triggers of transfusions in common dialysis scenarios were studied, and based on adaptive choice-based conjoint-derived preferences, relative importance by performing multivariable regression to identify predictors of transfusion preferences was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 350 providers completed the survey (n=305 nephrologists; mean age=46 years; 21% women). Of 10 attributes assessed, absolute hemoglobin level was the most important driver of transfusions, accounting for 29% of decision-making, followed by functional status (16%) and cardiovascular comorbidities (12%); 92% of providers transfused when hemoglobin was 7.5 g/dl, independent of other factors. In multivariable regression, Veterans Administration providers were more likely to transfuse at 8.0 g/dl (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 18.4). Although transplant eligibility explained only 5% of decision-making, nephrologists were five times more likely to value it as important compared with non-nephrologists (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.4 to 11.1). CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis was useful in predicting influences on transfusion decisions. Hemoglobin level, functional status, and cardiovascular comorbidities most strongly influenced transfusion decision-making, but preference variations were observed among subgroups.
Authors: Deborah Marshall; John F P Bridges; Brett Hauber; Ruthanne Cameron; Lauren Donnalley; Ken Fyie; F Reed Johnson Journal: Patient Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf Journal: Value Health Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Marc A Pfeffer; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Chao-Yin Chen; Mark E Cooper; Dick de Zeeuw; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Jan M Feyzi; Peter Ivanovich; Reshma Kewalramani; Andrew S Levey; Eldrin F Lewis; Janet B McGill; John J V McMurray; Patrick Parfrey; Hans-Henrik Parving; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Ajay K Singh; Scott D Solomon; Robert Toto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesco Locatelli; Ronald L Pisoni; Christian Combe; Juergen Bommer; Vittorio E Andreucci; Luis Piera; Roger Greenwood; Harold I Feldman; Friedrich K Port; Philip J Held Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Morrell Michael Avram; Daniel Blaustein; Paul A Fein; Naveen Goel; Jyotiprakas Chattopadhyay; Neal Mittman Journal: Kidney Int Suppl Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.545
Authors: John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Peter Glassman; Sharad Jain; Joyce Hansen; Maureen Spell; Martin Lee Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-11-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Christopher V Almario; Michelle S Keller; Michelle Chen; Karen Lasch; Lyann Ursos; Julia Shklovskaya; Gil Y Melmed; Brennan M R Spiegel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Kira L Newman; Raymond J Lynch; Andrew B Adams; Rebecca Zhang; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: David T Gilbertson; Heng Yan; Hairong Xu; Marvin Sinsakul; Yi Peng; James B Wetmore; Jiannong Liu; Suying Li Journal: Kidney360 Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Aya A Mitani; Benjamin A Goldstein; M Alan Brookhart; Glenn M Chertow Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Douglas S Fuller; Brian A Bieber; Ronald L Pisoni; Yun Li; Hal Morgenstern; Tadao Akizawa; Stefan H Jacobson; Francesco Locatelli; Friedrich K Port; Bruce M Robinson Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Dennis H Murphree; Theresa N Kinard; Nandita Khera; Curtis B Storlie; Che Ngufor; Sudhindra Upadhyaya; Jyotishman Pathak; Emma Fortune; Eapen K Jacob; Rickey E Carter; Karl A Poterack; Daryl J Kor Journal: Trials Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Aminu K Bello; Christine M Ribic; Serge H Cournoyer; Mercedeh Kiaii; Martine LeBlanc; Melanie Poulin-Costello; David N Churchill; Norman Muirhead Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2018-06-05