Literature DB >> 34599037

Patient Health Outcomes following Dialysis Facility Closures in the United States.

Jingbo Niu1, Maryam K Saeed1, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer1, Kevin F Erickson2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ongoing changes to reimbursement of United States dialysis care may increase the risk of dialysis facility closures. Closures may be particularly detrimental to the health of patients receiving dialysis, who are medically complex and clinically tenuous.
METHODS: We used two separate analytic strategies-one using facility-based matching and the other using propensity score matching-to compare health outcomes of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis at United States facilities that closed with outcomes of similar patients who were unaffected. We used negative binomial and Cox regression models to estimate associations of facility closure with hospitalization and mortality in the subsequent 180 days.
RESULTS: We identified 8386 patients affected by 521 facility closures from January 2001 through April 2014. In the facility-matched model, closures were associated with 9% higher rates of hospitalization (relative rate ratio [RR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.03 to 1.16), yielding an absolute annual rate difference of 1.69 hospital days per patient-year (95% CI, 0.45 to 2.93). Similarly, in a propensity-matched model, closures were associated with 7% higher rates of hospitalization (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; P=0.04), yielding an absolute rate difference of 1.08 hospital days per year (95% CI, 0.04 to 2.12). Closures were associated with nonsignificant increases in mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.18; P=0.05 for the facility-matched comparison; HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.17; P=0.08 for the propensity-matched comparison).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients affected by dialysis facility closures experienced increased rates of hospitalization in the subsequent 180 days and may be at increased risk of death. This highlights the need for effective policies that continue to mitigate risk of facility closures.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United States Renal Data System; clinical nephrology; end stage kidney disease; epidemiology and outcomes; hemodialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34599037      PMCID: PMC8722806          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2021020244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   14.978


  28 in total

1.  The 2009 proposed rule for prospective ESRD payment: perspectives from a large dialysis organization.

Authors:  Allen R Nissenson; Tracy J Mayne; Mahesh Krishnan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Self-delivery of hemodialysis care: a therapy in itself.

Authors:  C Meers; M A Singer; E B Toffelmire; W Hopman; M McMurray; A R Morton; T A MacKenzie
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Impact of Hurricane Sandy on hospital emergency and dialysis services: a retrospective survey.

Authors:  Chou-Jui Lin; Lauren C Pierce; Patricia M Roblin; Bonnie Arquilla
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.040

4.  Hospital closure and insights into patient dispersion: the closure of Saint Vincent's Catholic Medical Center in New York City.

Authors:  N Garg; G Husk; T Nguyen; A Onyile; S Echezona; G Kuperman; J S Shapiro
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Rebasing the Medicare payment for dialysis: rationale, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Diane Wish; Doug Johnson; Jay Wish
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  The effects of safety net hospital closures and conversions on patient travel distance to hospital services.

Authors:  Gloria J Bazzoli; Woolton Lee; Hui-Min Hsieh; Lee Rivers Mobley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The impact of hospital-based skilled nursing facility closures on rehospitalizations.

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; Jacqueline S Zinn; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD.

Authors:  Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden J Manns; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Experience of Nurses in Hemodialysis Care: A Phenomenological Study.

Authors:  Hosien Shahdadi; Mozhgan Rahnama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.