Literature DB >> 14988060

Response amendment latencies during discrete arm movements.

L G Carlton1, M J Carlton.   

Abstract

Examinations of the ability to rapidly modify ongoing movements have found that amendment latencies are shorter when a visual stimulus specifies an increase in movement velocity as compared to when a movement reversal is required. Our present study examined the hypothesis that amendment latencies for both continue and reverse instructions are dependent on the muscle activation state when the amendment is produced. Visual stimuli representing continue and reverse instructions wer represented at four different phases of a discrete arm movement, with amendment latencies measured to modified electromyographic (EMG) patterns. Amendment latencies for the continue instruction were shortest when the stimulus was presented early in the movement and increased when the stimulus was presented later in the response. The opposite trend was true for the reversal condition with long latencies occurring when the stimulus was presented early in the movement. Our findings support the notion that amendment latencies are directly related to the active state of the motor system when the modification is required, and the nature of the amendment to be generated.

Year:  1987        PMID: 14988060     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  3 in total

1.  The time course of amplitude specification in brief interceptive actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Annaliese Plooy; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Trajectories of reaches to prismatically-displaced targets: evidence for "automatic" visuomotor recalibration.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Fast-ball sports experts depend on an inhibitory strategy to reprogram their movement timing.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakamoto; Sachi Ikudome; Kengo Yotani; Atsuo Maruyama; Shiro Mori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.