Literature DB >> 32611177

Ambulatory monitoring of Lombard-related vocal characteristics in vocally healthy female speakers.

Thomas H Whittico1, Andrew J Ortiz1, Katherine L Marks1, Laura E Toles1, Jarrad H Van Stan1, Robert E Hillman1, Daryush D Mehta1.   

Abstract

Speakers typically modify their voice in the presence of increased background noise levels, exhibiting the classic Lombard effect. Lombard-related characteristics during everyday activities were recorded from 17 vocally healthy women who wore an acoustic noise dosimeter and ambulatory voice monitor. The linear relationship between vocal sound pressure level and environmental noise level exhibited an average slope of 0.54 dB/dB and value of 72.8 dB SPL at 50 dBA when correlation coefficients were greater than 0.4. These results, coupled with analyses of spectral and cepstral vocal function measures, provide normative ambulatory Lombard characteristics for comparison with patients with voice-use related disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32611177      PMCID： PMC7316514          DOI： 10.1121/10.0001446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN： 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator.

Authors:  Harold A Cheyne; Helen M Hanson; Ronald P Genereux; Kenneth N Stevens; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Arianna Astolfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measurement and prediction of speech and noise levels and the Lombard effect in eating establishments.

Authors:  Murray Hodgson; Gavin Steininger; Zohreh Razavi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Observations of the relationship between noise exposure and preschool teacher voice usage in day-care center environments.

Authors:  Fredric Lindstrom; Kerstin Persson Waye; Maria Södersten; Anita McAllister; Sten Ternström
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Analysing the vocal behaviour of teachers during classroom teaching using a portable voice accumulator.

Authors:  Manfred Nusseck; Bernhard Richter; Claudia Spahn; Matthias Echternach
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.487

6.  Four-day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teachers: Relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics.

Authors:  Giuseppina Emma Puglisi; Arianna Astolfi; Lady Catherine Cantor Cutiva; Alessio Carullo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice.

Authors:  E B Holmberg; R E Hillman; J S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Inhibiting the Lombard effect.

Authors:  H L Pick; G M Siegel; P W Fox; S R Garber; J K Kearney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vocal Behavior in Environmental Noise: Comparisons Between Work and Leisure Conditions in Women With Work-related Voice Disorders and Matched Controls.

Authors:  Annika Szabo Portela; Svante Granqvist; Sten Ternström; Maria Södersten
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  The Lombard effect.

Authors:  Sue Anne Zollinger; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 10.834
View more
  5 in total

1.  Psychometric Analysis of an Ecological Vocal Effort Scale in Individuals With and Without Vocal Hyperfunction During Activities of Daily Living.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Alessandra Verdi; Laura E Toles; Kaila L Stipancic; Andrew J Ortiz; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Differences in Daily Voice Use Measures Between Female Patients With Nonphonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction and Matched Controls.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Andrew J Ortiz; Juan P Cortes; Katherine L Marks; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta; James A Burns; Tiffiny Hron; Tara Stadelman-Cohen; Carol Krusemark; Jason Muise; Annie B Fox-Galalis; Charles Nudelman; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Vocal Behavior of Teachers Reading with Raised Voice in a Noisy Environment.

Authors:  Manfred Nusseck; Anna Immerz; Bernhard Richter; Louisa Traser
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Sebastian Waz; Emily Buss; Yi Shen; Virginia Richards; Hari Bharadwaj; G Christopher Stecker; Jordan A Beim; Adam K Bosen; Meredith D Braza; Anna C Diedesch; Claire M Dorey; Andrew R Dykstra; Frederick J Gallun; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lincoln Gray; Eric C Hoover; Antje Ihlefeld; Thomas Koelewijn; Judy G Kopun; Juraj Mesik; Daniel E Shub; Jonathan H Venezia
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring.

Authors:  Laura E Toles; Andrew J Ortiz; Katherine L Marks; James A Burns; Tiffiny Hron; Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.408
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.