Literature DB >> 18387464

Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction?

Caprice C Greenberg1, Eric C Schneider, Stuart R Lipsitz, Clifford Y Ko, Jennifer L Malin, Arnold M Epstein, Jane C Weeks, Katherine L Kahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of postmastectomy reconstruction varies with socioeconomic status, but the etiology of these variations is not understood. We investigated whether these differences reflect variations in the rate or qualitative aspects of the provider's discussion of reconstruction as an option. STUDY
DESIGN: Data were collected through chart review and patient survey for stages I to III breast cancer patients during the National Initiative on Cancer Care Quality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reconstruction and discussion of reconstruction as an option. Predictors of not receiving reconstruction despite a documented discussion were also determined.
RESULTS: There were 253 of 626 patients who received reconstruction (40.4%). Younger, more educated Caucasian women who were not overweight or receiving postmastectomy radiation were more likely to receive reconstruction. Patients who were younger, more educated, and not receiving postmastectomy radiation were more likely to have a documented discussion of reconstruction. If a discussion was documented, patients who were older, Hispanic, not born in the US, and received postmastectomy radiation were less likely to receive reconstruction. The greatest predictor of reconstruction was medical record documentation of a discussion about reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed disparities in the likelihood of reconstruction that were at least partially explained by differences in the likelihood that reconstruction was discussed. But there were also differences in the likelihood of reconstruction based on age, race, and radiation once discussions occurred. Efforts to increase and improve discussions about reconstruction may decrease disparities for this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18387464      PMCID: PMC4002201          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  38 in total

1.  Developing a system to assess the quality of cancer care: ASCO's national initiative on cancer care quality.

Authors:  Eric C Schneider; Jennifer L Malin; Katherine L Kahn; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Variations in treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in elderly women.

Authors:  Heather Taffet Gold; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The effect of patients' preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  M Morrow; S K Scott; H R Menck; T A Mustoe; D P Winchester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  J H Rowland; K A Desmond; B E Meyerowitz; T R Belin; G E Wyatt; P A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Determinants of patients' choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  P Ananian; G Houvenaeghel; C Protière; P Rouanet; S Arnaud; J P Moatti; A Tallet; A C Braud; C Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Breast cancer treatment in older women: impact of the patient-physician interaction.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Barbara Leake; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Explanatory models of and attitudes towards cancer in different cultures.

Authors:  Simon Dein
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Factors that influence the completion of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Albert Losken; Grant W Carlson; Mark B Schoemann; Glyn E Jones; John H Culbertson; T Roderick Hester
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Predictors of patients' choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  S Molenaar; F Oort; M Sprangers; E Rutgers; E Luiten; J Mulder; H de Haes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Decline in Racial Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis from 1998 to 2014.

Authors:  Amanda R Sergesketter; Samantha M Thomas; Whitney O Lane; Jonah P Orr; Ronnie L Shammas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Rachel A Greenup; Scott T Hollenbeck
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Preoperative patient education for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Beth Aviva Preminger; Valerie Lemaine; Isabel Sulimanoff; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Geographic Variation Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction Utilization in Ontario, Canada and Plastic Surgeon Availability: A Population-Based Observational Study.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Toni Zhong; Rahim Moineddin; Gillian L Booth; Alexandra M Easson; Kimberly Fernandes; Peter Gozdyra; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Invited commentary.

Authors:  Marquita R Decker; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Racial and ethnic variations in one-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas L Berlin; Adeyiza O Momoh; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Sacramento area breast cancer epidemiology study: use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction along the rural-to-urban continuum.

Authors:  Warren H Tseng; Thomas R Stevenson; Robert J Canter; Steven L Chen; Vijay P Khatri; Richard J Bold; Steve R Martinez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  The impact of breast reconstruction on the delivery of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; E Dale Collins; Anne Schott; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Richard L Theriault; Yu-Ning Wong; Jane C Weeks; Joyce C Niland; Stephen B Edge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Single dual-trained surgeon for breast care leads to higher reconstruction rates after mastectomy.

Authors:  Ashkaun Shaterian; Salim C Saba; Brittany Yee; Christopher Tokin; Brian Mailey; Marek K Dobke; Anne M Wallace
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Persistent Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction and Strategies for Mitigation.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Martin P Morris; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.