Literature DB >> 15156978

Factors that influence the completion of breast reconstruction.

Albert Losken1, Grant W Carlson, Mark B Schoemann, Glyn E Jones, John H Culbertson, T Roderick Hester.   

Abstract

Post mastectomy breast reconstruction continues to evolve in both timing and technique; however, multiple surgical procedures are usually required. The purpose of this report was to determine the number of secondary procedures required to complete the breast reconstruction and factors that influence this process. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospital between 1975 and 2000 were reviewed. The end point and inclusion criterion was completion to nipple reconstruction. Secondary procedures were determined per patient for either unilateral or bilateral reconstructions, and defined as any surgical manipulation of the reconstructed breast, contralateral breast, or donor site. The cohort was stratified by timing and method of reconstruction. Additional variables included risk factors, radiation therapy, and complications. A total of 888 patients completed the reconstructive process (738 unilateral and 150 bilateral). The average number of secondary procedures was 3.99 for unilateral, and 5.54 for bilateral. Delayed reconstructions had a higher number of secondary procedures in both groups. Transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap reconstruction tended to have more secondary procedures than implant or latissimus dorsi with or without implant reconstructions. Radiation therapy increased the number of secondary procedures in unilateral (3.9 versus 4.6, P < 0.001) and in bilateral reconstructions (5.7 versus 6.4, P = 0.032). The number of secondary procedures also increased exponentially with the number of risk factors (0-4), and patients with any complication had a higher number of secondary procedures for unilateral (4.5 versus 3.6, P < 0.001) and bilateral reconstructions (6.4 versus 4.5, P < 0.001). Secondary breast and donor site procedures were used as an outcome measure to formulate comparisons. Autologous tissue reconstruction required more secondary procedures, likely in part to donor site revisions. Delayed reconstruction, the need for radiation therapy, any complication, and more risk factors significantly increased the number of secondary procedures required to complete the reconstructive process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15156978     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000110560.03010.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  10 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Ahmed; A Snelling; M Bains; I H Whitworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-23

2.  Receipt of delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: do women revisit the decision?

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Barbara Salem; Ann Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven Katz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The Necessity of the Nipple: Redefining Completeness in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  E Hope Weissler; Julie B Schnur; Andreas M Lamelas; Marisa Cornejo; Elan Horesh; Peter J Taub
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  Tetyana P Shippee; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kathleen Rowan; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 May-Jun

5.  Single-stage immediate breast reconstruction using a skin-sparing incision and definitive saline implants compared with a two-stage reconstruction using tissue expansion plus implants.

Authors:  Mathew A Plant; Christopher G Scilley; Mark Speechley
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2009

6.  Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Eric C Schneider; Stuart R Lipsitz; Clifford Y Ko; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold M Epstein; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

8.  Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score.

Authors:  John Y S Kim; Alexei S Mlodinow; Nima Khavanin; Keith M Hume; Christopher J Simmons; Michael J Weiss; Robert X Murphy; Karol A Gutowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-06-05

9.  Analysis of Secondary Surgeries after Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Cancer Compared with Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Stacey J Jones; Philip Turton; Rajgopal Achuthan; Brian V Hogan; Shireen N Mckenzie; Baek Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-12-17

10.  Incidence and Outcomes of Completion Mastectomy following Oncoplastic Reduction: A Case Series.

Authors:  Nusaiba F Baker; Ciara A Brown; Toncred M Styblo; Grant W Carlson; Albert Losken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.