Literature DB >> 15249342

Determinants of patients' choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer.

P Ananian1, G Houvenaeghel, C Protière, P Rouanet, S Arnaud, J P Moatti, A Tallet, A C Braud, C Julian-Reynier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to measure women's decisions about breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy and to assess the factors contributing to their decisions, in a context involving shared decision-making and maximum patient autonomy.
METHODS: Women who were about to undergo mastectomy for primary breast cancer were systematically offered choices concerning BR and time of reconstruction (intervention always covered by the French National Insurance System). Self-administered questionnaires were used prior to the operation.
RESULTS: Among the 181 respondents, 81% opted for BR and 19% for mastectomy alone. In comparison with those who chose mastectomy alone, those opting for BR more frequently recognized the importance of discussing these matters with the surgeon and their partner (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)] = 13.45 and 3.59, respectively; P <.05) and realized that their body image was important (OR(adj) = 10.55, P <.01); fears about surgery prevented some of the women from opting for BR (OR(adj) = 0.688, P <.05). Among the women opting for BR, 83% chose immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and 17% chose delayed breast reconstruction (DBR). The preference for IBR was mainly attributable to the fact that these women had benefited more frequently from doctor-patient discussions (OR(adj) = 3.49, P <.05) but was also attributable to the patients' physical and functional characteristics: they were in a poorer state of health (P <.05). The surgeons predicted their patients' preferences fairly accurately.
CONCLUSIONS: In a context of maximum autonomy, the great majority of the women chose IBR. The patients' choices were explained mainly by their psychosocial characteristics. The indication for BR should be properly discussed between patients and surgeons before mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249342     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2004.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  28 in total

1.  Decline in Racial Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis from 1998 to 2014.

Authors:  Amanda R Sergesketter; Samantha M Thomas; Whitney O Lane; Jonah P Orr; Ronnie L Shammas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Rachel A Greenup; Scott T Hollenbeck
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Sexual abuse in childhood and postoperative depression in women with breast cancer who opt for immediate reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  Louise Clark; Christopher Holcombe; Jonathan Hill; Margorit Rita Krespi-Boothby; Jean Fisher; Joanna Seward; Peter Salmon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Sacramento area breast cancer epidemiology study: use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction along the rural-to-urban continuum.

Authors:  Warren H Tseng; Thomas R Stevenson; Robert J Canter; Steven L Chen; Vijay P Khatri; Richard J Bold; Steve R Martinez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Stuart R Lipsitz; Melissa E Hughes; Stephen B Edge; Richard Theriault; John L Wilson; W Bradford Carter; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce Niland; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Eric C Schneider; Stuart R Lipsitz; Clifford Y Ko; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold M Epstein; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Relationships between personal beliefs and treatment acceptability, and preferences for behavioral treatments.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Joyal Miranda; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Jennifer Cousins; Patricia Moritz
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-06-24

8.  Breast reconstructive surgery in medically underserved women with breast cancer: the role of patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yihang Liu; Elaine Kwong; Amardeep Thind; Allison L Diamant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Patricia Moritz; Joyal Miranda
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 10.  Psychological Aspects of Breast Reconstruction after Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Pittermann; Christine Radtke
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.