Literature DB >> 18387389

Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate.

Florian R Schroeck1, Chiquita A Palha de Sousa, Ross A Kalman, Maitri S Kalia, Sean A Pierre, George E Haleblian, Leon Sun, Judd W Moul, David M Albala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the learning curves and perioperative outcomes of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon and his trainees to assess our structured teaching program.
METHODS: We retrieved 383 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) from our database. Trainees completed a structured teaching program and were categorized as early (days 0 to 232), mid (days 566 to 797), and late (days 825 to 1218) according to the time period in which they were working with the mentor. We compared operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates between the trainees and the mentor (Mann-Whitney and Chi-square test). Association of EBL, body mass index (BMI), and prostate weight with operative time was evaluated in multivariate linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: Median operative times of the early, mid, and late trainees (258, 220, and 200 minutes) significantly decreased and were similar to the corresponding senior surgeon's (254, 242, and 180 minutes). Operative times decreased with lower BMI, EBL, and prostate weight (P = 0.006, P <0.001, and P <0.001, respectively). Overall, EBL (150 mL vs. 150 mL, P = 0.215) and PSM rates (20% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.741) did not differ between the mentor and the trainees.
CONCLUSIONS: A structured teaching program for RALP is effective and trainees are able to adopt the increased efficiency and skills of their mentor. Lower BMI, EBL, and prostate weight were associated with shorter operative times. Trainees performing the procedure did not negatively affect EBL and positive surgical margin rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18387389     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

1.  Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents.

Authors:  Sonal Grover; Gerald Y Tan; Abhishek Srivastava; Robert A Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.

Authors:  John A Harris; Anne G Sammarco; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Neil Kamdar; Darrel Campbell; Sarah Evilsizer; John O DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Robotic surgery.

Authors:  Adam Jones; Krishna Sethia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Robotic surgery in ear nose and throat.

Authors:  Amit Parmar; David G Grant; Peter Loizou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Implementing a robotics curriculum at an academic general surgery training program: our initial experience.

Authors:  Joshua S Winder; Ryan M Juza; Jennifer Sasaki; Ann M Rogers; Eric M Pauli; Randy S Haluck; Stephanie J Estes; Jerome R Lyn-Sue
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-03-19

8.  Structured learning for robotic surgery utilizing a proficiency score: a pilot study.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Thomas Bottyan; Thomas G Clifford; Sarfaraz Serang; Zein K Nakhoda; Swar H Shah; Hana Yokoi; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Towards standardized robotic surgery in gastrointestinal oncology.

Authors:  Lawrence M Knab; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Douglas J Wiebe; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.