BACKGROUND: Clinicians in ambulatory care settings are increasingly called upon to use health information technology (health IT) to improve practice efficiency and performance. Successful adoption of health IT requires an understanding of how clinical tasks and workflows will be affected; yet this has not been well described. OBJECTIVE: To describe how health IT functions within a clinical context. DESIGN: Qualitative study, using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Executives and staff at 4 community health centers, 3 health center networks, and 1 large primary care organization. APPROACH: Transcribed audio-recorded interviews, analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Systematic characterization of clinical context identified 6 primary clinical domains. These included results management, intra-clinic communication, patient education and outreach, inter-clinic coordination, medication management, and provider education and feedback. We generated clinical process diagrams to characterize these domains. Participants suggested that underlying workflows for these domains must be fully operational to ensure successful deployment of health IT. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the clinical context is a necessary precursor to successful deployment of health IT. Process diagrams can serve as the basis for EHR certification, to identify challenges, to measure health IT adoption, or to develop curricular content regarding the role of health IT in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Clinicians in ambulatory care settings are increasingly called upon to use health information technology (health IT) to improve practice efficiency and performance. Successful adoption of health IT requires an understanding of how clinical tasks and workflows will be affected; yet this has not been well described. OBJECTIVE: To describe how health IT functions within a clinical context. DESIGN: Qualitative study, using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Executives and staff at 4 community health centers, 3 health center networks, and 1 large primary care organization. APPROACH: Transcribed audio-recorded interviews, analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Systematic characterization of clinical context identified 6 primary clinical domains. These included results management, intra-clinic communication, patient education and outreach, inter-clinic coordination, medication management, and provider education and feedback. We generated clinical process diagrams to characterize these domains. Participants suggested that underlying workflows for these domains must be fully operational to ensure successful deployment of health IT. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the clinical context is a necessary precursor to successful deployment of health IT. Process diagrams can serve as the basis for EHR certification, to identify challenges, to measure health IT adoption, or to develop curricular content regarding the role of health IT in clinical practice.
Authors: Jerome A Osheroff; Jonathan M Teich; Blackford Middleton; Elaine B Steen; Adam Wright; Don E Detmer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ashish K Jha; Timothy G Ferris; Karen Donelan; Catherine DesRoches; Alexandra Shields; Sara Rosenbaum; David Blumenthal Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Steven R Simon; Rainu Kaushal; Paul D Cleary; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; Eric G Poon; E John Orav; Helen G Lo; Deborah H Williams; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-10-26 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Bruce E Landon; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Tracy A Lieu; Thomas Keegan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas D Sequist; David A Cook; Jennifer S Haas; Ronnie Horner; William M Tierney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Martin C Were; Changyu Shen; Mwebesa Bwana; Nneka Emenyonu; Nicholas Musinguzi; Frank Nkuyahaga; Annet Kembabazi; William M Tierney Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Judy E Kim-Hwang; Alice Hm Chen; Douglas S Bell; David Guzman; Hal F Yee; Margot B Kushel Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-05-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alexandra T Strauss; Diego A Martinez; Andres Garcia-Arce; Stephanie Taylor; Candice Mateja; Peter J Fabri; Jose L Zayas-Castro Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 2.796