Literature DB >> 18364299

Mucoadhesive films inside the colonic tube: performance in a three-dimensional world.

D Dodou1, M van den Berg, J van Gennip, P Breedveld, P A Wieringa.   

Abstract

A self-propelling colonoscopic device moving inside the colonic tube should be able to periodically grip safely to the colonic wall as well as to manipulate the generated friction. The feasibility of achieving high grip and friction manipulation by covering the device with mucoadhesive films is experimentally tested. More precisely, the frictional behaviour of mucoadhesive films inside the colonic tube is tested in vitro in porcine colon. It appears that mucoadhesive films generate significantly higher friction than conventional materials (ANOVA p=0, 95% CIs=-3.04, -2.14). The geometry of the film plays a role as well. When holes are, for instance, present in the film geometry and are large enough so that the colonic tissue can wrap their borders, friction can be significantly increased (ANOVA p=0, 95% CIs=-2.53, -1.26). By altering the contact area or the film geometry, friction manipulation can be achieved. Moreover, a simple theoretical model is developed and experimentally verified (R=0.92). The model can be used to estimate the level of the friction generated by three-dimensional configurations of mucoadhesive films as a function of their geometric characteristics and the material properties of the colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18364299      PMCID: PMC2607443          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  7 in total

1.  Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study.

Authors:  M L Anderson; T M Pasha; J A Leighton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  What is normal intra-abdominal pressure?

Authors:  N C Sanchez; P L Tenofsky; J M Dort; L Y Shen; S D Helmer; R S Smith
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Frictional resistance characteristics of a capsule inside the intestine for microendoscope design.

Authors:  N K Baek; I H Sung; D E Kim
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 4.  Mucoadhesives in the gastrointestinal tract: revisiting the literature for novel applications.

Authors:  Dimitra Dodou; Paul Breedveld; Peter A Wieringa
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.571

5.  Complications of endoscopy.

Authors:  S M Kavic; M D Basson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Air-pressure-induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy.

Authors:  R A Kozarek; D L Earnest; M E Silverstein; R G Smith
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Treatment options in irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Michael J G Farthing
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.043

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Preliminary mechanical characterization of the small bowel for in vivo robotic mobility.

Authors:  Benjamin S Terry; Allison B Lyle; Jonathan A Schoen; Mark E Rentschler
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place... and how they may be avoided.

Authors:  Arjo J Loeve; Paul Fockens; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Measurements of the contact force from myenteric contractions on a solid bolus.

Authors:  Benjamin S Terry; Jonathan A Schoen; Mark E Rentschler
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-03-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.