Literature DB >> 22010745

Preliminary mechanical characterization of the small bowel for in vivo robotic mobility.

Benjamin S Terry1, Allison B Lyle, Jonathan A Schoen, Mark E Rentschler.   

Abstract

In this work we present test methods, devices, and preliminary results for the mechanical characterization of the small bowel for intra luminal robotic mobility. Both active and passive forces that affect mobility are investigated. Four investigative devices and testing methods to characterize the active and passive forces are presented in this work: (1) a novel manometer and a force sensor array that measure force per cm of axial length generated by the migrating motor complex, (2) a biaxial test apparatus and method for characterizing the biomechanical properties of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, (3) a novel in vitro device and protocol designed to measure the energy required to overcome the self-adhesivity of the mucosa, and (4) a novel tribometer that measures the in vivo coefficient of friction between the mucus membrane and the robot surface. The four devices are tested on a single porcine model to validate the approach and protocols. Mean force readings per cm of axial length of intestine that occurred over a 15 min interval in vivo were 1.34 ± 0.14 and 1.18 ± 0.22 N cm(-1) in the middle and distal regions, respectively. Based on the biaxial stress/stretch tests, the tissue behaves anisotropically with the circumferential direction being more compliant than the axial direction. The mean work per unit area for mucoseparation of the small bowel is 0.08 ± 0.03 mJ cm(-2). The total energy to overcome mucoadhesion over the entire length of the porcine small bowel is approximately 0.55 J. The mean in vivo coefficient of friction (COF) of a curved 6.97 cm(2) polycarbonate sled on live mucosa traveling at 1 mm s(-1) is 0.016 ± 0.002. This is slightly lower than the COF on excised tissue, given the same input parameters. We have initiated a comprehensive program and suite of test devices and protocols for mechanically characterizing the small bowel for in vivo mobility. Results show that each of the four protocols and associated test devices has successfully gathered preliminary data to confirm the validity of our test approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22010745      PMCID: PMC5413140          DOI: 10.1115/1.4005168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  28 in total

Review 1.  Manometric techniques for the evaluation of colonic motor activity: current status.

Authors:  S M Scott
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Frictional resistance characteristics of a capsule inside the intestine for microendoscope design.

Authors:  N K Baek; I H Sung; D E Kim
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Intestinal propulsion of a solid non-deformable bolus.

Authors:  R Miftahof; E Fedotov
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Fiber kinematics of small intestinal submucosa under biaxial and uniaxial stretch.

Authors:  Thomas W Gilbert; Michael S Sacks; Jonathan S Grashow; Savio L-Y Woo; Stephen F Badylak; Michael B Chancellor
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Dynamics of intestinal propulsion.

Authors:  R Miftahof; N Akhmadeev
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Time-dependent biaxial mechanical behavior of the aortic heart valve leaflet.

Authors:  John A Stella; Jun Liao; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Feasibility proof of a legged locomotion capsule for the GI tract.

Authors:  Marco Quirini; Arianna Menciassi; Sergio Scapellato; Paolo Dario; Fabian Rieber; Chi-Nghia Ho; Sebastian Schostek; Marc Oliver Schurr
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Computerized analysis of ambulatory long-term small-bowel manometry.

Authors:  R Widmer; T Schmidt; A Pfeiffer; H Kaess
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  A method for measuring strains in soft tissue.

Authors:  A H Hoffman; P Grigg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Louis Phee; Dino Accoto; Arianna Menciassi; Cesare Stefanini; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Paolo Dario
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Capsule endoscopy of the future: What's on the horizon?

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Theoretical tools to analyze anorectal mechanophysiological data generated by the Fecobionics device.

Authors:  Donghua Liao; Abbey Sc Chen; Kar Man Lo; Jingbo Zhao; Kaori Futaba; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Measurements of the contact force from myenteric contractions on a solid bolus.

Authors:  Benjamin S Terry; Jonathan A Schoen; Mark E Rentschler
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-03-14

4.  Sensorless Estimation of the Planar Distal Shape of a Tip-Actuated Endoscope.

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Nabil Simaan; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2019-07-04

5.  Mechanically induced development and maturation of human intestinal organoids in vivo.

Authors:  Holly M Poling; David Wu; Nicole Brown; Michael Baker; Taylor A Hausfeld; Nhan Huynh; Samuel Chaffron; James C Y Dunn; Simon P Hogan; James M Wells; Michael A Helmrath; Maxime M Mahe
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 29.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.