Literature DB >> 11151871

Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study.

M L Anderson1, T M Pasha, J A Leighton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence, clinical features, and management of endoscopic colon perforations in a large number of patients at a major medical teaching center.
METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of all patients with colon perforations from endoscopy over a 10-yr period.
RESULTS: A total of 10,486 colonoscopies were performed over a 10-yr period. There were 20 (0.19%) perforations and two (0.019%) deaths related to colonoscopy and two perforations with no deaths in 49,501 sigmoidoscopies (0.004%). The majority of perforations (65%) occurred in the sigmoid colon. The mean age of the patients was 72 yr (range, 48-87 yr). Multivariate analysis using gender and age showed that female gender was an independent predictor of a higher risk of perforation (p < 0.05). Electrocautery injury (36%) and mechanical injury (32%) from the tip and shaft of the endoscope were the major causes for perforation. Most patients (91%) presented within 48 h of endoscopy. Nine patients (47%) required a surgical resection with primary anastomosis; seven (37%) required a simple closure. The average hospital length of stay was 7.7 +/- 2.8 days. Although trainee endoscopists were involved in only 20% of the colonoscopies performed, eight (40%) perforations occurred while the training fellow was involved in the case. However, this increased risk of perforation with a training fellow was not statistically significant (p = 0.625).
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy can result in significant morbidity and carries a small risk of death. Sigmoidoscopy has lower risk. The following situations may represent increased risk to colonoscopy patients: unusual difficulty in traversing the sigmoid colon; difficult examinations in female patients, and difficult examinations performed by trainee physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11151871     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03356.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  117 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks.

Authors:  A Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang Pyo Kim; Judy Yee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

2.  Guidance on large bowel surveillance for people with two first degree relatives with colorectal cancer or one first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer under 45 years.

Authors:  M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Perforation of sigmoid diverticulum following endoscopic polypectomy of an adenoma.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Lisheng Yang; Yu Guo; Donghui Zhao; Li Wang; Lan Bai
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-03-30

4.  Competence and credentialing in endoscopy.

Authors:  Girish Mishra
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-12

5.  Therapeutic options for iatrogenic colon perforation: feasibility of endoscopic clip closure and predictors of the need for early surgery.

Authors:  Sung Bum Cho; Wan Sik Lee; Young Eun Joo; Hyeng Rok Kim; Sang Wook Park; Chang Hwan Park; Hyeun Soo Kim; Sung Kyu Choi; Jong Sun Rew
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, peumopericardium, and subcutaneous emphysema after colonoscopic examination.

Authors:  Nark-Soon Park; Jae Hyun Choi; Dong Hun Lee; Young Jin Kim; Eun Sun Kim; Sung Woo Jung; Ja Seol Koo; Hong Sik Lee; Sang Woo Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Thomas G Hurley; Lekhena Sros; James R Hebert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Endoscopic clip closure versus surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colon perforations developed during diagnostic colonoscopy: a review of 115,285 patients.

Authors:  Joon Sung Kim; Byung-Wook Kim; Jin Il Kim; Jeong Ho Kim; Sang Woo Kim; Jeong-Seon Ji; Bo-In Lee; Hwang Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and application.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.