Literature DB >> 18364041

Auditory scene analysis: the interaction of stimulation rate and frequency separation on pre-attentive grouping.

Pierfilippo De Sanctis1, Walter Ritter, Sophie Molholm, Simon P Kelly, John J Foxe.   

Abstract

Segregation of auditory inputs into meaningful acoustic groups is a key element of auditory scene analysis. Previously, we showed that two interwoven sets of tones differing widely along multiple feature dimensions (duration, pitch and location) were pre-attentively separated into different groups, and that tones separated in this manner did not elicit the mismatch negativity component with respect to each other. Grouping was studied with human subjects using a stimulus rate too slow to induce streaming. Here, we varied the separation of tone sequences along a single feature dimension, i.e. frequency. Frequency differences were either 24 Hz (small) or 1054 Hz (large). Two relatively slow stimulus rates were used (2.7 or 1 tone/s) to explicitly investigate grouping outside the so-called 'streaming effect', which requires rates of about 4 tones/s or faster. Two tones were presented in a quasi-random manner with embedded trains of one to four identical tones in a row. Deviants were defined as frequency switches after trains of four identical tones. Mismatch negativity was only elicited for small frequency switches at the slower stimulation rate. The data indicate that pre-attentive grouping of tones occurred when the frequency difference that separated them was large, regardless of stimulation rate. For small frequency differences, inputs were only grouped separately when the stimulation rate was relatively fast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18364041      PMCID: PMC2696930          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06080.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  29 in total

1.  Organizing sound sequences in the human brain: the interplay of auditory streaming and temporal integration.

Authors:  H Yabe; I Winkler; I Czigler; S Koyama; R Kakigi; T Sutoh; T Hiruma; S Kaneko
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects.

Authors:  W Ritter; E Sussman; S Molholm
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-01-17       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Effects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  A S Bregman; P A Ahad; P A Crum; J O'Reilly
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

4.  The effect of perceptual grouping on the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  H Gaeta; D Friedman; W Ritter; J Cheng
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Preattentive auditory context effects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Mari Tervaniemi; János Horváth; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Memory reactivation or reinstatement and the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Walter Ritter; Elyse Sussman; Sophie Molholm; John J Foxe
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Representation of the standard: stimulus context effects on the process generating the mismatch negativity component of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Elyse Sussman; Karen Sheridan; Judith Kreuzer; István Winkler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential.

Authors:  R A Butler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The role of large-scale memory organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential.

Authors:  I Winkler; E Schröger; N Cowan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river.

Authors:  T W Picton; C Alain; L Otten; W Ritter; A Achim
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2000 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Automatic cortical representation of auditory pitch changes in Rett syndrome.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Kelly M Burke; Gizely N Andrade; Aleksandra Djukic; Hans-Peter Frey; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Auditory sensory memory span for duration is severely curtailed in females with Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Tufikameni Brima; Sophie Molholm; Ciara J Molloy; Olga V Sysoeva; Eric Nicholas; Aleksandra Djukic; Edward G Freedman; John J Foxe
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Mitigation of informational masking in individuals with single-sided deafness by integrated bone conduction hearing aids.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Stephen Bowditch; Yinda Liu; Marc Eisen; John K Niparko
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Right Hemispheric Contributions to Fine Auditory Temporal Discriminations: High-Density Electrical Mapping of the Duration Mismatch Negativity (MMN).

Authors:  Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Sophie Molholm; Marina Shpaner; Walter Ritter; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.