Literature DB >> 12946119

Representation of the standard: stimulus context effects on the process generating the mismatch negativity component of event-related brain potentials.

Elyse Sussman1, Karen Sheridan, Judith Kreuzer, István Winkler.   

Abstract

In the auditory oddball paradigm, the frequent occurrence of a sound (the "standard") forms the basis of deviance detection. The incoming sounds are compared with the cortical representation of the standard and those sounds that do not match it elicit the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related brain potential. Here we address the issue of whether the relative probability of the sounds in a sequence was a critical factor influencing which sounds would be represented as standards in the deviant comparison process. One frequent (F1) and two infrequent (D1 and D2) sounds that differed only in duration were presented in a sequence. D1 occurred proportionally as frequently with respect to D2 as F1 occurred with respect to D1. If the proportional relationship of sounds were critical then D1 could serve as a "standard" to D2 and thus D2 should elicit two MMNs. However, D2 elicited MMN only with respect to F1. This result as well as those obtained in two control conditions suggests that "standards" are not established on the basis of relative probability; they emerge as a result of global characteristics, the longer-term context, of the sound sequence.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946119     DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  11 in total

1.  Auditory scene analysis: the interaction of stimulation rate and frequency separation on pre-attentive grouping.

Authors:  Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Walter Ritter; Sophie Molholm; Simon P Kelly; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Influence of ventral tegmental area input on cortico-subcortical networks underlying action control and decision making.

Authors:  Anja Richter; Oliver Gruber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Category effects: is top-down control alone sufficient to elicit the mismatch negativity (MMN) component?

Authors:  G Sadia; W Ritter; E Sussman
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 5.  Forecasting Remission From the Psychosis Risk Syndrome With Mismatch Negativity and P300: Potentials and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Holly K Hamilton; Brian J Roach; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-10-24

6.  Looking for a pattern: an MEG study on the abstract mismatch negativity in musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Sibylle C Herholz; Claudia Lappe; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Attention Matters: Pitch vs. Pattern Processing in Adolescence.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10

8.  Modelling the emergence and dynamics of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming.

Authors:  Robert W Mill; Tamás M Bőhm; Alexandra Bendixen; István Winkler; Susan L Denham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Effects of musical training and event probabilities on encoding of complex tone patterns.

Authors:  Anja Kuchenbuch; Evangelos Paraskevopoulos; Sibylle C Herholz; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Context effects on processing widely deviant sounds in newborn infants.

Authors:  Gábor P Háden; Renáta Németh; Miklós Török; Sándor Drávucz; István Winkler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.