Literature DB >> 18363776

Evaluating candidate principal surrogate endpoints.

Peter B Gilbert1, Michael G Hudgens.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Frangakis and Rubin (2002, Biometrics 58, 21-29) proposed a new definition of a surrogate endpoint (a "principal" surrogate) based on causal effects. We introduce an estimand for evaluating a principal surrogate, the causal effect predictiveness (CEP) surface, which quantifies how well causal treatment effects on the biomarker predict causal treatment effects on the clinical endpoint. Although the CEP surface is not identifiable due to missing potential outcomes, it can be identified by incorporating a baseline covariate(s) that predicts the biomarker. Given case-cohort sampling of such a baseline predictor and the biomarker in a large blinded randomized clinical trial, we develop an estimated likelihood method for estimating the CEP surface. This estimation assesses the "surrogate value" of the biomarker for reliably predicting clinical treatment effects for the same or similar setting as the trial. A CEP surface plot provides a way to compare the surrogate value of multiple biomarkers. The approach is illustrated by the problem of assessing an immune response to a vaccine as a surrogate endpoint for infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18363776      PMCID: PMC2726718          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01014.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Principal stratification in causal inference.

Authors:  Constantine E Frangakis; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Use of statistical models for evaluating antibody response as a correlate of protection against varicella.

Authors:  Ivan S F Chan; Shu Li; Holly Matthews; Christina Chan; Rupert Vessey; Jerald Sadoff; Joseph Heyse
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Augmented designs to assess immune response in vaccine trials.

Authors:  Dean Follmann
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Counterfactual links to the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Yue Wang; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases.

Authors:  L S Freedman; B I Graubard; A Schatzkin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments.

Authors:  M Buyse; G Molenberghs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  An analytic method for randomized trials with informative censoring: Part 1.

Authors:  J M Robins
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria.

Authors:  R L Prentice
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Correlation between immunologic responses to a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine and incidence of HIV-1 infection in a phase 3 HIV-1 preventive vaccine trial.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Michael L Peterson; Dean Follmann; Michael G Hudgens; Donald P Francis; Marc Gurwith; William L Heyward; David V Jobes; Vladimir Popovic; Steven G Self; Faruk Sinangil; Donald Burke; Phillip W Berman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Causal inference in infectious diseases.

Authors:  M E Halloran; C J Struchiner
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  66 in total

1.  Comparing biomarkers as principal surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Commentary on "Principal stratification - a goal or a tool?" by Judea Pearl.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Michael G Hudgens; Julian Wolfson
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  A unified procedure for meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  James Y Dai; James P Hughes
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Augmented trial designs for evaluation of principal surrogates.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Dean Follmann
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Evaluating surrogate marker information using censored data.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Spline-based models for predictiveness curves and surfaces.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Michael Sabel
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 0.582

7.  Response to Andrew Dunning's comment on 'evaluating a surrogate endpoint at three levels, with application to vaccine development'.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Li Qin; Steven G Self
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Evaluating principal surrogate endpoints with time-to-event data accounting for time-varying treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 9.  Modeling HIV vaccine trials of the future.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ying Huang; Holly E Janes
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Surrogacy assessment using principal stratification with multivariate normal and Gaussian copula models.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Anna S C Conlon; Michael R Elliott
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.