Literature DB >> 24337534

Evaluating principal surrogate endpoints with time-to-event data accounting for time-varying treatment efficacy.

Erin E Gabriel1, Peter B Gilbert.   

Abstract

Principal surrogate (PS) endpoints are relatively inexpensive and easy to measure study outcomes that can be used to reliably predict treatment effects on clinical endpoints of interest. Few statistical methods for assessing the validity of potential PSs utilize time-to-event clinical endpoint information and to our knowledge none allow for the characterization of time-varying treatment effects. We introduce the time-dependent and surrogate-dependent treatment efficacy curve, ${\mathrm {TE}}(t|s)$, and a new augmented trial design for assessing the quality of a biomarker as a PS. We propose a novel Weibull model and an estimated maximum likelihood method for estimation of the ${\mathrm {TE}}(t|s)$ curve. We describe the operating characteristics of our methods via simulations. We analyze data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, in which we find evidence of a biomarker with value as a PS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case–control study; Causal inference; Clinical trials; Principal stratification; Survival analysis; Treatment efficacy curve; Weibull model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337534      PMCID: PMC3944974          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  16 in total

1.  Principal stratification in causal inference.

Authors:  Constantine E Frangakis; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Intensive diabetes therapy and glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ian H de Boer; Wanjie Sun; Patricia A Cleary; John M Lachin; Mark E Molitch; Michael W Steffes; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparing biomarkers as principal surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Counterfactual links to the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Yue Wang; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  ASSESSING SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN VACCINE TRIALS WITH CASE-COHORT SAMPLING AND THE COX MODEL.

Authors:  Li Qin; Peter B Gilbert; Dean Follmann; Dongfeng Li
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Related causal frameworks for surrogate outcomes.

Authors:  Marshall M Joffe; Tom Greene
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A Bayesian approach to improved estimation of causal effect predictiveness for a principal surrogate endpoint.

Authors:  Corwin M Zigler; Thomas R Belin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The hazards of hazard ratios.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Extended follow-up confirms early vaccine-enhanced risk of HIV acquisition and demonstrates waning effect over time among participants in a randomized trial of recombinant adenovirus HIV vaccine (Step Study).

Authors:  Ann Duerr; Yunda Huang; Susan Buchbinder; Robert W Coombs; Jorge Sanchez; Carlos del Rio; Martin Casapia; Steven Santiago; Peter Gilbert; Lawrence Corey; Michael N Robertson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Statistical identifiability and the surrogate endpoint problem, with application to vaccine trials.

Authors:  Julian Wolfson; Peter Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  18 in total

1.  Augmented trial designs for evaluation of principal surrogates.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Dean Follmann
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Evaluating surrogate marker information using censored data.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Predicting Overall Vaccine Efficacy in a New Setting by Re-Calibrating Baseline Covariate and Intermediate Response Endpoint Effect Modifiers of Type-Specific Vaccine Efficacy.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ying Huang
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2016-01-23

4.  Inference on treatment effect modification by biomarker response in a three-phase sampling design.

Authors:  Michal Juraska; Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Evaluation and comparison of predictive individual-level general surrogates.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Michael C Sachs; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Surrogate markers for time-varying treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  Jesse Y Hsu; Edward H Kennedy; Jason A Roy; Alisa J Stephens-Shields; Dylan S Small; Marshall M Joffe
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation: Principal Stratification Criteria and the Prentice Definition.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Erin E Gabriel; Ying Huang; Ivan S F Chan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2015-02-01

8.  Evaluating principal surrogate markers in vaccine trials in the presence of multiphase sampling.

Authors:  Ying Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  An Introduction to Principal Surrogate Evaluation with the pseval Package.

Authors:  Michael C Sachs; Erin E Gabriel
Journal:  R J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Power/sample size calculations for assessing correlates of risk in clinical efficacy trials.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Holly E Janes; Yunda Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.