Literature DB >> 16426398

A multicenter experience with novel implantable cardioverter defibrillator configurations in the pediatric and congenital heart disease population.

Elizabeth A Stephenson1, Anjan S Batra, Timothy K Knilans, Robert M Gow, Rainer Gradaus, Seshadri Balaji, Anne M Dubin, Edward K Rhee, Pamela S Ro, Anna M Thøgersen, Frank Cecchin, John K Triedman, Edward P Walsh, Charles I Berul.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In pediatric and congenital heart disease patients, transvenous ICD implantation may be limited secondary to patient size, venous, or cardiac anatomy. Epicardial patches require a thoracotomy, and may lead to a restrictive pericardial process. Because of these issues, we have explored novel ICD configurations.
METHODS: Retrospective review at 10 centers implanting ICDs without a transvenous shocking coil or epicardial patches.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent implant at a mean age of 8.9 years (range: 0.3-43.5), with a mean weight of 25.5 kg (range: 5.2-70). Diagnoses included complex CHD, intracardiac tumors, cardiomyopathy, idiopathic VT, LV noncompaction, and long QT syndrome. Three configurations were used: subcutaneous array, a transvenous design ICD lead placed on the epicardium, or a transvenous design ICD lead placed subcutaneously. Difficulties were found at implant in 8 patients: 4 had difficulty inducing VT/VF, and 4 had high DFTs. Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 years (range: 0.2-10.5), 7 patients had appropriate shocks. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 4 patients. System revisions were required in 7 patients: 2 generator changes (in 1 patient), 3 pace-sense lead replacement, 1 additional subcutaneous coil placement due to increased DFT, 1 upgrade to a transvenous system, and 1 revision to epicardial patch system.
CONCLUSIONS: ICD implantation can be performed without epicardial patches or transvenous high-energy leads in this population, using individualized techniques. This will allow ICD use in patients who have intracardiac shunting or are deemed too small for transvenous ICD leads. The long-term outcome and possible complications are as yet unknown in this population, and they should be monitored closely with follow-up DFTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16426398     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00271.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  30 in total

1.  Intrapericardial and retrocardial implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead in a child with type 3 long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ichikawa; Mari Iwamoto; Sadamitsu Yanagi; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Incessant ventricular tachycardia due to multiple cardiac rhabdomyomas in an infant with Tuberous Sclerosis.

Authors:  Pallavi A Kathare; Kalyan S Muthuswamy; Jaishankar Sadasivan; Narasimhan Calumbar; Nageswara Rao Koneti
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-12-25

3.  Successful implantation of an intracardiac defibrillator in an infant with long QT syndrome and isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium.

Authors:  Ozge Surmeli Onay; Isil Yildirim; Burcin Beken; Sevcan Erdem; Tevfik Karagoz; Mustafa Yilmaz; Sule Yigit
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Congenital long QT syndrome: diagnosis and management in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yaniv Bar-Cohen; Michael J Silka
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-09

Review 5.  Clinical experience with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Lewis; Michael R Gold
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Prospective evaluation of defibrillation threshold and postshock rhythm in young ICD recipients.

Authors:  Andrew E Radbill; John K Triedman; Charles I Berul; Edward P Walsh; Mark E Alexander; Gregory Webster; Frank Cecchin
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 7.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in adults with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jim T Vehmeijer; Tom F Brouwer; Jacqueline Limpens; Reinoud E Knops; Berto J Bouma; Barbara J M Mulder; Joris R de Groot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Predictive modeling of defibrillation using hexahedral and tetrahedral finite element models: recent advances.

Authors:  John K Triedman; Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Dana H Brooks; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.438

9.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator as a bridge to recovery in an infant with cardiac rhabdomyoma.

Authors:  Priya Chockalingam; Sally-Ann B Clur; Arthur A M Wilde; Irene Kuipers; Job van Woensel; Nico A Blom
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Cardiac arrhythmias in congenital heart diseases.

Authors:  Paul Khairy; Seshadri Balaji
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2009-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.