Literature DB >> 1835624

Double-blind randomised trial of the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in advanced breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

N W Marschner1, M Adler, G A Nagel, D Christmann, E Fenzl, B Upadhyaya.   

Abstract

Ondansetron was compared with metoclopramide for antiemetic efficacy in a randomised double-blind trial in 122 patients with advanced breast cancer. All patients were treated with epirubicin (greater than 50 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (greater than 500 mg/m2). 50 patients receiving ondansetron and 60 with metoclopramide were considered evaluable. Ondansetron was at least as effective as metoclopramide in the control of vomiting and nausea. The percentage of patients with complete plus major control was 72% (59-85%) vs. 61% (48-74%) on day 1 (P = 0.230) and 79% (67-91%) vs. 66% (53-78%) on days 2-3 after chemotherapy (P = 0.122). Over the 3-day study period, nausea was absent or mild in 60% of the patients treated with ondansetron, compared to 45% given metoclopramide (P = 0.064). No major drug-related side-effects were reported. 1 patient receiving ondansetron experienced gastrointestinal disturbance and headache. Episodes of diarrhoea, fever, hyperkinetic syndrome, fatigue, restlessness and migraine with vomiting were reported by 5 patients treated with metoclopramide. None of the changes in the biochemical or haematological parameters was attributed to the antiemetic treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1835624     DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90311-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; E Ballatori; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Efficacy and safety of different doses of granisetron for the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis.

Authors:  E A Perez; R M Navari; H G Kaplan; R J Gralla; S M Grunberg; R H Palmer; D Fitts
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Ondansetron: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its antiemetic activity in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; R J Milne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Drug treatment of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis.

Authors:  R Tavorath; P J Hesketh
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art.

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero; E Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Ondansetron. An update of its therapeutic use in chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Anthony Markham; Eugene M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  [Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].

Authors:  A Du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01

Review 8.  Reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Current perspectives and future possibilities.

Authors:  A Del Favero; F Roila; M Tonato
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis in the 1990s: impact of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P J Hesketh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Pharmacokinetic profile and clinical efficacy of a once-daily ondansetron suppository in cyclophosphamide-induced emesis: a double blind comparative study with ondansetron tablets.

Authors:  R de Wit; J H Beijnen; O van Tellingen; J H Schellens; M de Boer-Dennert; J Verweij
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.