Literature DB >> 10147044

Ondansetron: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its antiemetic activity in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

G L Plosker1, R J Milne.   

Abstract

Ondansetron is more effective than high-dose metoclopramide in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting due to highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and, unlike metoclopramide, is rarely associated with extrapyramidal effects. Pharmacoeconomic analyses have demonstrated that, in specified clinical settings, ondansetron (8mg 4-hourly for 3 doses or 8mg followed by 1 mg/h for 24 hours) is equally cost-effective as high-dose metoclopramide (3 mg/kg followed by 0.5 mg/kg/h for 8 hours) in the prophylaxis of emesis in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, at an acquisition cost 4- or 5-fold higher than that of the metoclopramide regimen. Furthermore, the combination of dexamethasone plus ondansetron has been shown to be more effective than ondansetron monotherapy in controlling emesis. In patients receiving high-dose ( greater than 50 mg/m2) cisplatin-based chemotherapy, antiemetic therapy with ondansetron (8mg intravenously as a single dose) plus dexamethasone (16mg total intravenous dose) was shown to be more cost-effective than the combination of high-dose metoclopramide (11 mg/kg total intravenous dose), dexamethasone (8mg intravenously as a single dose) plus lorazepam (1 to 1.5mg intravenously as a single dose). In a limited number of studies, quality-of-life scores, as assessed using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist or the Functional Living Index--Emesis instrument, were significantly higher with ondansetron than with other antiemetic agents, including metoclopramide. Together, these results suggest that ondansetron, as an alternative to antiemetic regimens including high-dose metoclopramide, is appropriate cost-effective therapy for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Ondansetron is effective in controlling acute emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, and its use in this clinical setting may best be reserved for patients who have not responded well to previous antiemetic therapy with more traditional agents. However, poorly controlled emesis can lead to anticipatory nausea and vomiting in subsequent courses of chemotherapy, thus, consideration should also be given to the use of ondansetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, although further pharmacoeconomic investigations are required to clarify its use in this clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10147044     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199202040-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  69 in total

1.  Extrapyramidal reaction to ondansetron.

Authors:  J R Halperin; B Murphy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Publication of unethical studies on the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; A Del Favero
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Extrapyramidal reactions with high-dose metoclopramide.

Authors:  M G Kris; L B Tyson; R J Gralla; R A Clark; J C Allen; L K Reilly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Ondansetron. Therapeutic use as an antiemetic.

Authors:  R J Milne; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Ondansetron versus metoclopramide in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting - a metaanalysis.

Authors:  J Rusthoven; B Obrien; A Rocchi
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  An overview on the use of granisetron in the treatment of emesis associated with cytostatic chemotherapy.

Authors:  M V Tabona
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Antagonism of serotonin S3 receptors with ondansetron prevents nausea and emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy regimens.

Authors:  L X Cubeddu; I S Hoffman; N T Fuenmayor; A L Finn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Italian Group For Antiemetic Research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind multicenter randomized crossover study comparing ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; F Cognetti; E Cortesi; G Favalli; M Marangolo; D Amadori; M A Bella; V Gramazio; D Donati
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Ondansetron plus dexamethasone: an effective combination in high-dose cisplatin therapy. The Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Authors:  M Tonato
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  11 in total

1.  Determinants of hospital drug expenditures in Western Europe.

Authors:  P Thürmann; S Harder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Principles of quality of life assessment in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  B R Cassileth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of ondansetron versus metoclopramide regimens: a hospital perspective from Italy.

Authors:  E Ballatori; F Roila; P Berto; V De Angelis; C Neri; A Olivieri; M Tonato; A Del Favero
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Systemic therapy in breast cancer: efficacy and cost utility.

Authors:  J F Corry; P E Lønning
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Ondansetron: costs and resource utilisation in a US teaching hospital setting.

Authors:  N E Johnson; D B Nash; C E Carpenter; C J Sistek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Granisetron. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  [Effectiveness and cost of 5-HT3-antagonists in acute chemotherapy-induced emesis. Health-economic analysis based on current meta-analytic data].

Authors:  B Brüggenjürgen; A du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1997-12-15

8.  Is ondansetron cost effective?

Authors:  J Bonneterre
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Ondansetron. A review of its pharmacology and preliminary clinical findings in novel applications.

Authors:  M I Wilde; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Ondansetron Does Not Reduce Withdrawal in Patients With Physical Dependence on Chronic Opioid Therapy.

Authors:  Larry F Chu; John Sun; Anna Clemenson; Matthew J Erlendson; Tom Rico; Erika Cornell; Hannah Obasi; Zahra N Sayyid; Ellen M Encisco; Jeff Yu; Jamison G Gamble; Ian Carroll; J David Clark
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.