Literature DB >> 8829304

Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.

F Roila1, M Tonato, E Ballatori, A Del Favero.   

Abstract

Since 1981, when high-dose intravenous metoclopramide was demonstrated to be efficacious, slow but constant improvement in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis has been achieved. Today, a combination of a serotonin receptor 3 (5-HT3) antagonist plus dexamethasone can be considered the most efficacious treatment for the prevention of emesis induced by cisplatin and by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Which 5-HT3receptor antagonist should be used? Preclinical differences among 5-HT3receptor antagonists have been reported with regard to selectivity of receptor binding, potency, dose response, and duration of action. Twelve comparative studies among 5-HT3receptor antagonists have been carried out. Unfortunately, all these trials have some important shortcomings (patient population not large enough to show small but clinically important differences; not blinded studies; no association with steroids to maximize treatment efficacy) and, therefore, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Very recently three large, well-conducted double-blind comparative studies have been published. All three showed that 5-HT3receptor antagonists have almost identical antiemetic efficacy and tolerability. Therefore, the choice among the 5-HT3receptor antagonists should be based only on the acquisition cost of the prescribed dose in each country for each compound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8829304     DOI: 10.1007/bf01358879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  47 in total

1.  Are all 5-HT3 receptor antagonists the same?

Authors:  P L Andrews; P Bhandari; P T Davey; S Bingham; H E Marr; P R Blower
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  A comparative study of the use of granisetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist, versus a standard anti-emetic regimen of chlorpromazine plus dexamethasone in the treatment of cytostatic-induced emesis. The Granisetron Study Group.

Authors:  M Marty
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Italian Group For Antiemetic Research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Ondansetron versus granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  V Gebbia; G Cannata; A Testa; G Curto; R Valenza; C Cipolla; M A Latteri; N Gebbia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy--a randomised study.

Authors:  I T Jantunen; T T Muhonen; V V Kataja; M K Flander; L Teerenhovi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis in out-patients: a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study. Emesis Study Group for Ondansetron and Granisetron in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  A Stewart; B McQuade; J D Cronje; L Goedhals; A Gudgeon; L Corette; X Froger; M Tubiana-Hulin; P Laplaige; J T Roberts
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group.

Authors:  T M Beck; A A Ciociola; S E Jones; W H Harvey; N S Tchekmedyian; A Chang; D Galvin; N E Hart
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

Authors:  P J Hesketh; W H Harvey; W G Harker; T M Beck; T Ryan; L J Bricker; J A Kish; W K Murphy; J D Hainsworth; B Haley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind multicenter randomized crossover study comparing ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; F Cognetti; E Cortesi; G Favalli; M Marangolo; D Amadori; M A Bella; V Gramazio; D Donati
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.

Authors:  C Seynaeve; J Schuller; K Buser; H Porteder; S Van Belle; P Sevelda; D Christmann; M Schmidt; H Kitchener; D Paes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Antiemetic support: a continuous challenge.

Authors:  M Dicato
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Nanomedicines in the treatment of emesis during chemotherapy: focus on aprepitant.

Authors:  Ian Olver; Suhas Shelukar; Karen C Thompson
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007

3.  Side effects associated with the use of dexamethasone for prophylaxis of delayed emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Vardy; K S Chiew; J Galica; G R Pond; I F Tannock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.