Literature DB >> 8688345

Pharmacokinetic profile and clinical efficacy of a once-daily ondansetron suppository in cyclophosphamide-induced emesis: a double blind comparative study with ondansetron tablets.

R de Wit1, J H Beijnen, O van Tellingen, J H Schellens, M de Boer-Dennert, J Verweij.   

Abstract

We investigated the pharmacokinetic profile and the efficacy of ondansetron (day 1) given as 16 mg suppository once a day, as compared with ondansetron 8 mg tablets twice daily, in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The study was primarily aimed at investigating the pharmacokinetics and was part of a large multinational, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy efficacy trial. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained in a total of 20 patients, 11 of whom had received a suppository containing ondansetron, and nine patients had received the oral formulation. The median area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) obtained with the oral formulation was 226 ng ml-1h-1 (range 91-750), and the median maximum plasma level (Cmax) was 50.5 ng ml-1 (range 24.7-199.6) after a dose of 8 mg. For the ondansetron suppository the median AUC was 140 ng ml-1h-1 range (77-405) and the median Cmax was 17.1 ng ml-1 (range 13-48.3) after a dose of 16 mg. The systemic exposure after correction for the dose difference after the suppository was on average 70% lower than after the tablet. The median time to reach the maximum level (Tmax) was 60 min (range 28-120) with the oral formulation and 209 min (range 90-420) with the suppository. For both the tablet and suppository, there was no apparent relationship between either Cmax or AUC, and efficacy. Although the patient numbers were too small for a formal exposure-response relationship to be derived, the slightly poorer pharmacokinetic performance of the suppository did not appear to be associated with a lessening of control of emesis following chemotherapy. The study demonstrates that the pharmacokinetic analysis of a once-daily 16 mg ondansetron suppository results in appropriate plasma concentrations and AUC, and that this rectal formulation is effective in the protection against nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. This formulation will provide a useful alternative to the currently available oral formulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8688345      PMCID: PMC2074572          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the bioequivalence of tablet and capsule formulations of granisetron in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignant disease.

Authors:  D Cupissol; F Bressolle; L Adenis; J Carmichael; E Bessell; A Allen; M Wargenau; D Romain
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  A randomized double-blind comparison of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin or epirubicin chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Bonneterre; B Chevallier; R Metz; P Fargeot; E Pujade-Lauraine; M Spielmann; M Tubiana-Hulin; D Paes; J Bons
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A comparison of ondansetron with metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind study. International Emesis Study Group.

Authors:  S Kaasa; S Kvaløy; M A Dicato; F Ries; J V Huys; E Royer; L Carruthers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  Ondansetron metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J F Pritchard
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Oral ondansetron pharmacokinetics: the effect of chemotherapy.

Authors:  P H Hsyu; J F Pritchard; H P Bozigian; A E Gooding; R H Griffin; R Mitchell; T Bjurstrom; T L Panella; A T Huang; L A Hansen
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  On the receiving end--patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  A Coates; S Abraham; S B Kaye; T Sowerbutts; C Frewin; R M Fox; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-02

7.  Double-blind randomised trial of the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in advanced breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  N W Marschner; M Adler; G A Nagel; D Christmann; E Fenzl; B Upadhyaya
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Determination of ondansetron in plasma and its pharmacokinetics in the young and elderly.

Authors:  P V Colthup; C C Felgate; J L Palmer; N L Scully
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.534

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Anti-emetics for cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis: Potential of alternative delivery systems.

Authors:  L Kraut; A A Fauser
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  [Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].

Authors:  A Du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01

3.  Inhibition of Small-Conductance, Ca2+-Activated K+ Current by Ondansetron.

Authors:  Shuai Guo; Zhenhui Chen; Peng-Sheng Chen; Michael Rubart
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.810

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.