Literature DB >> 18353395

Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Lang Nguyen1, Jay Jhaveri, Ashutosh Tewari.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Shorter urethral sphincter length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has been associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary incontinence as well as longer time to achieve continence. We determined that our techniques of anatomical reconstruction for restoring the continence mechanism could markedly improve continence outcomes, especially in patients with a shorter urethral sphincter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 274 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy, as performed by a single surgeon, and for whom preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative evaluations were available. All sphincter lengths were measured on T2-weighted images as the distance from the prostatic apex to the penile bulb, cross-referencing all 3 planes. Continence was defined as zero pads or a liner used for security reasons only.
RESULTS: The 2 surgical modifications considerably hastened the return of continence at 6 months. The continence rate in the shorter sphincter group (less than 14 mm) was 47% for the control technique, 81% for anterior reconstruction and 90% for total reconstruction. The continence rate in the longer sphincter group (more than 14 mm) was 80% for the control technique and 83% for anterior reconstruction, while it approached 99% for total reconstruction. With the control technique the average time to achieve continence was significantly different between the shorter and longer sphincter groups (25 vs 12 weeks, p = 0.037). The significance disappeared for anterior reconstruction (7.4 vs 6.2 weeks, p = 0.27) and total reconstruction (3.6 vs 2.7 weeks, p = 0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are encouraging for patients with a short urethral sphincter who are considering radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18353395     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Prokar Dasgupta; Roger S Kirby
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Ke-Bing Wang; Xiao-Yong Pu; Xiang-Fu Zhou; Jian-Guang Qiu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Xiao-Yong Pu; Jie Si-Tu; Wen-Tao Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Functional and anatomical differences between continent and incontinent men post radical prostatectomy on urodynamics and 3T MRI: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Anne M Suskind; Charlene Neer; Hero Hussain; Jeffrey Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 6.  Comprehensive approach for post-prostatectomy incontinence in the era of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Ruriko Takinami; Ryo Tanji; Akifumi Onagi; Kanako Matsuoka; Tomoyuki Koguchi; Hidenori Akaihata; Junya Hata; Soichiro Ogawa; Masao Kataoka; Yuichi Sato; Kei Ishibashi; Ken Aikawa; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-26

7.  [Imaging diagnostics of the male pelvic floor].

Authors:  R Kirschner-Hermanns; R Anding; C G Stief; L Najjari; R M Bauer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Modified posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction decreases the posterior vesicourethral angle and improves urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Keiichi Ito; Seguchi Kenji; Hidehiko Yoshii; Shinsuke Hamada; Junichi Asakuma; Shinsuke Tasaki; Kenji Kuroda; Akinori Sato; Akio Horiguchi; Tomohiko Asano
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12

9.  The preoperative pad test as a predictor of urinary incontinence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, observational, clinical study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Kurimura; Nobuhiro Haga; Tomohiko Yanagida; Ryo Tanji; Akifumi Onagi; Ruriko Honda; Kanako Matsuoka; Seiji Hoshi; Junya Hata; Mitsutaka Onoda; Yuichi Sato; Hidenori Akaihata; Masao Kataoka; Soichiro Ogawa; Kei Ishibashi; Akio Matsubara; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Adnan Ali; Sheela Metgud; Nithin Theckumparampil; Abhishek Srivastava; Francesca Khani; Brian D Robinson; Naveen Gumpeni; Maria M Shevchuk; Matthieu Durand; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Jinyi Li; Robert Leung; Alexandra Peyser; Siobhan Gruschow; Vinita Asija; Niyati Harneja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.