Literature DB >> 23354288

Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing.

Ashutosh K Tewari1, Adnan Ali, Sheela Metgud, Nithin Theckumparampil, Abhishek Srivastava, Francesca Khani, Brian D Robinson, Naveen Gumpeni, Maria M Shevchuk, Matthieu Durand, Prasanna Sooriakumaran, Jinyi Li, Robert Leung, Alexandra Peyser, Siobhan Gruschow, Vinita Asija, Niyati Harneja.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report our unique approach for individualizing robotic prostate cancer surgery by risk stratification and sub classification of the periprostatic space into 4 distinct compartments, and thus performing 4 precise different grades of nerve sparing based on neurosurgical principles and to present updated potency and continence outcomes data of patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using our risk-stratified approach based on layers of periprostatic fascial dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: (1) Between January 2005 and December 2010, 2,536 men underwent RALP by a single surgeon at our institution. (2) Included patients were those with ≥ 1-year follow-up and were preoperatively continent and potent, defined as having a SHIM questionnaire score of >21; thus, the final number of patient in the study cohort was 1,335. (3) Postoperative potency was defined as the ability to have successful intercourse (score of ≥ 4 on question 2 of the SHIM); continence was defined as the use of no pads per 24 h.
RESULTS: (1) The potency and continence for NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found to be 90.6, 76.2, 60.5, and 57.1 % (P < 0.001) and 98, 93.2, 90.1, and 88.9 % (P < 0.001), respectively. (2) The overall PSM rates for patients with NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 10.5, 7, 5.8, and 4.8 %, respectively (P = 0.064).
CONCLUSIONS: The study found a correlation between risk-stratified grades of NS technique and continence and potency. Patients with lesser grades of NS had higher rates of potency and continence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23354288     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-1018-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  33 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting early return of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; James A Eastham
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule.

Authors:  Christian Eichelberg; Andreas Erbersdobler; Uwe Michl; Thorsten Schlomm; Georg Salomon; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Balancing continence function and oncological outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Authors:  Alexander Mottrie; Andrea Gallina; Peter De Wil; David Thüer; Giacomo Novara; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Abhishek Srivastava; Michael W Huang; Brian D Robinson; Maria M Shevchuk; Matthieu Durand; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Sonal Grover; Rajiv Yadav; Nishant Mishra; Sanjay Mohan; Danielle C Brooks; Nusrat Shaikh; Abhinav Khanna; Robert Leung
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The impact of cavernosal nerve preservation on continence after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Donald L Pick; Kathryn Osann; Douglas Skarecky; Navneet Narula; David S Finley; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Alok Shrivastava; Mahendra Bhandari; Ramgopal Satyanarayana; Siddharth Siva; Piyush K Agarwal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor; J C Eggleston
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Keijiro Kiyoshima; Akira Yokomizo; Takeshi Yoshida; Kentaro Tomita; Hirotoshi Yonemasu; Motonobu Nakamura; Yoshinao Oda; Seiji Naito; Yoshihiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  11 in total

1.  Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  D W Good; G D Stewart; J U Stolzenburg; S A McNeill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Sarvesh Tandon; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF POST-PROSTATECTOMY INCONTINENCE.

Authors:  Arthi Satyanarayan; Ryan Mooney; Nirmish Singla
Journal:  Eur Med J Urol       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of neuroanatomy of the prostate.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Park; Chang Wook Jeong; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-12-30

5.  Erectile dysfunction in robotic radical prostatectomy: Outcomes and management.

Authors:  Patrick Whelan; Shahid Ekbal; Ajay Nehra
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

6.  Prostate MRI prior to radical prostatectomy: effects on nerve sparing and pathological margin status.

Authors:  Sasha C Druskin; Jen-Jane Liu; Allen Young; Zhaoyong Feng; Seyed S Dianat; Wesley W Ludwig; Bruce J Trock; Katarzyna J Macura; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2017-04-18

Review 7.  Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Qianfeng Zhuang; Renfang Xu; Hao Lu; Guanglai Song; Jianping Wang; Zinong Tian; Qingyan Mao; Pengfeng Gong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Indications for nerve-sparing surgery for radical prostatectomy: Results from a single-center study.

Authors:  Zaisheng Zhu; Yiyi Zhu; Yunyuan Xiao; Shengye Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.

Authors:  Jin-Guo Wang; Jiaoti Huang; Arnold I Chin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Review.

Authors:  Paolo Capogrosso; Andrea Salonia; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.