Literature DB >> 24649279

Modified posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction decreases the posterior vesicourethral angle and improves urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Keiichi Ito1, Seguchi Kenji1, Hidehiko Yoshii1, Shinsuke Hamada1, Junichi Asakuma1, Shinsuke Tasaki1, Kenji Kuroda1, Akinori Sato1, Akio Horiguchi1, Tomohiko Asano1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of our modified posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction (PMPR) procedure in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Prior to 2010, four operative procedures were used to expedite continence recovery: preserving the fascia covering the levator ani muscle, preserving the bladder neck, securing a functional urethral length by using a lateral-view dissection technique and suspending the vesicourethral anastomosis from the puboprostatic ligaments. Since February, 2010, a running suture between Denonvilliers' fascia (DF) and the median fibrous raphe (MFR, the fibrous tissue that lies immediately underneath the urethra) has also been used. In vesicourethral anastomosis, a double-armed running suture was performed. At the beginning of the anastomosis, the first stitches (at 1 and 11 o'clock positions on the bladder neck) were placed 1-2 cm dorsocephalad to the bladder neck (first through the seromuscular layer and then through the full thickness of the bladder neck). At the 5 and 7 o'clock positions of the urethra, the stitches were placed through the urethral mucosa as well as the the reconstructed musculofascial plate. The bladder shape was evaluated by postoperative cystography and the clinical results were compared between patients undergoing LRP without PMPR (group A) and those undergoing LRP with PMPR (group B). The cystograms demonstrated that the PMPR significantly shortened the vertical length of the bladder and significantly decreased the posterior vesicourethral angle. At 1, 3 and 6 months after LRP, the number of daily used pads was significantly lower in group B compared to that in group A and the time to achieve a pad-free status was significantly shorter in group B. Our modified PMPR procedure significantly improved the recovery of urinary continence following LRP and this improvement may be due in part to changes of the bladder shape.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction; urinary incontinence; vesicourethral angle

Year:  2013        PMID: 24649279      PMCID: PMC3915695          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2013.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: irrational exuberance?

Authors:  L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Topographical relationship between urethral rhabdosphincter and rectourethralis muscle: a better understanding of the apical dissection and the posterior stitches in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hideo Soga; Atsushi Takenaka; Gen Murakami; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy with running vesicourethral anastomosis and early catheter removal: our experience.

Authors:  Choichiro Ozu; Jun Hagiuda; Yoshihiro Nakagami; Riu Hamada; Yutaka Horiguchi; Kunihiko Yoshioka; Jun Nakashima; Tadashi Hatano; Masaaki Tachibana
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction promotes early restoration of continence and prevents severe incontinence in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Masakazu Nakashima; Takao Haitani; Yoichiro Kajita; Yasumasa Shichiri
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; X Cathelineau; E Barret; F Rozet; G Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter.

Authors:  Francesco Rocco; Luca Carmignani; Pietro Acquati; Franco Gadda; Paolo Dell'Orto; Bernardo Rocco; Stefano Casellato; Giacomo Gazzano; Dario Consonni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kenneth J Palmer; Geoff Coughlin; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Nerve-sparing surgery significantly affects long-term continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kalyana C Nandipati; Rupesh Raina; Ashok Agarwal; Craig D Zippe
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Surgical outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: summary of early multiinstitutional experience in Japan.

Authors:  Shin Egawa; Yoichi Arai; Mutsushi Kawakita; Tadashi Matsuda; Masatoshi Tanaka; Seiji Naito; Kazuhiro Okumura; Toshiro Terachi; Shinsuke Hayami; Kazuo Suzuki; Momokazu Gotoh; Yoshinari Ono; Shiro Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  A randomized clinical trial of suspension technique for improving early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Masanori Noguchi; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Shigetaka Suekane; Osamu Nakashima; Elnisr Rashed Mohamed; Kei Matsuoka
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic Floor Reconstruction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Jianfeng Cui; Hu Guo; Yan Li; Shouzhen Chen; Yaofeng Zhu; Shiyu Wang; Yong Wang; Xigao Liu; Wenbo Wang; Jie Han; Pengxiang Chen; Shuping Nie; Gang Yin; Benkang Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.