Literature DB >> 1835163

Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain.

C G Greenough1, R D Fraser.   

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of eight psychometric instruments was made in 274 patients who were currently suffering or previously had suffered from low-back pain. The specificity and sensitivity values for detection of psychological disturbance were calculated and optimum cutoff scores determined for each test. The influence of current pain, social group, compensation, migrant status, and unemployment on the accuracy of each test were evaluated. The Pain Drawing, the Inappropriate Symptoms, the Inappropriate Signs, and the Illness Behavior Questionnaire were found to be least discriminating. The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety Scale, the Hospital Depression Scale, and the Zung Depression Scale were the most accurate and least affected by the factors examined. The combination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and the Zung Depression Scale yielded specificities and sensitivities of 91% and 84% for men and 96% and 85% for women, respectively. This combination is recommended for the assessment of psychological disturbance in patients with low-back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1835163     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199109000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Caporaso; N Pulkovski; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  How well do observed functional limitations explain the variance in Roland Morris scores in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain undergoing physiotherapy?

Authors:  F Caporaso; N Pulkovski; H Sprott; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Social labeling, stereotyping, and observer bias in workers' compensation: The impact of provider-patient interaction on outcome.

Authors:  L O Niemeyer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-12

5.  A prospective study of the interrelationship between subjective and objective measures of disability before and 2 months after lumbar decompression surgery for disc herniation.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Jiri Dvorak; Markus Müntener; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Cancer pain and depression: a systematic review of age-related patterns.

Authors:  Lucia Gagliese; Lynn R Gauthier; Gary Rodin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Spinal segmental stabilisation exercises for chronic low back pain: programme adherence and its influence on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Daniel Helbling; Natascha Pulkovski; Haiko Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Colored Pain Drawing as a Clinical Tool in Differentiating Neuropathic Pain from Non-Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Nalini Sehgal; Debra B Gordon; Scott Hetzel; Miroslav Misha Backonja
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 9.  [Questionnaires for patients with back pain. Diagnosis and outcome assessment].

Authors:  A Junge; A F Mannion
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Raymond Denzler; Jiri Dvorak; Markus Müntener; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.