Literature DB >> 17593405

A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine.

Anne F Mannion1, Raymond Denzler, Jiri Dvorak, Markus Müntener, Dieter Grob.   

Abstract

Spinal decompression is the most common type of spinal surgery carried out in the older patient, and is being performed with increasing frequency. Physiotherapy (rehabilitation) is often prescribed after surgery, although its benefits compared with no formal rehabilitation have yet to be demonstrated in randomised control trials. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to examine the effects on outcome up to 2 years after spinal decompression surgery of two types of postoperative physiotherapy compared with no postoperative therapy (self-management). Hundred and fifty-nine patients (100 men, 59 women; 65 +/- 11 years) undergoing decompression surgery for spinal stenosis/herniated disc were randomised to one of the following programmes beginning 2 months post-op: recommended to "keep active" (CONTROL; n = 54); physiotherapy, spine stabilisation exercises (PT-StabEx; n = 56); physiotherapy, mixed techniques (PT-Mixed; n = 49). Both PT programmes involved 2 x 30 min sessions/week for up to 12 weeks, with home exercises. Pain intensity (0-10 graphic rating scale, for back and leg pain separately) and self-rated disability (Roland Morris) were assessed before surgery, before and after the rehabilitation phase (approx. 2 and 5 months post-op), and at 12 and 24 months after the operation. 'Intention to treat' analyses were used. At 24 months, 151 patients returned questionnaires (effective return rate, excluding 4 deaths, 97%). Significant reductions in leg and back pain and self-rated disability were recorded after surgery (P < 0.05). Pain showed no further changes in any group up to 24 months later, whereas disability declined further during the "rehabilitation" phase (P < 0.05) then stabilised, but with no significant group differences. 12 weeks of post-operative physiotherapy did not influence the course of change in pain or disability up to 24 months after decompression surgery. Advising patients to keep active by carrying out the type of physical activities that they most enjoy appears to be just as good as administering a supervised rehabilitation program, and at no cost to the health-care provider.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17593405      PMCID: PMC2200780          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0399-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  56 in total

Review 1.  What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S Hollis; F Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

2.  Do training diaries affect and reflect adherence to home programs?

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-08-15

3.  A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain.

Authors:  Kelvin Jordan; Kate M Dunn; Martyn Lewis; Peter Croft
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy.

Authors:  A Herno; K Partanen; T Talaslahti; E Kaukanen; V Turunen; O Suomalainen; O Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The failed back--an orthopaedic view.

Authors:  V Mooney
Journal:  Int Disabil Stud       Date:  1988

6.  Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-15

7.  Preliminary results of the use of a two-stage treadmill test as a clinical diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J M Fritz; R E Erhard; A Delitto; W C Welch; P E Nowakowski
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-10

8.  Correlation of patient satisfaction with symptom severity and walking ability after surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Kazuo Yamashita; Junzo Hayashi; Kenji Ohzono; Kazuo Hiroshima
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Laminectomy and functional impairment of the lumbar spine: the importance of muscle forces in flexible and rigid instrumented stabilization--a biomechanical study in vitro.

Authors:  U Quint; H J Wilke; F Löer; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ).

Authors:  C J Main
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.006

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy.

Authors:  Marco Teli; Alessio Lovi; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Antonino Zagra; Andrea Corriero; Fabrizio Giudici; Leone Minoia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Investigating and predicting early lumbar spine surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Saddam F Kanaan; Paul M Arnold; Douglas C Burton; Hung-Wen Yeh; Lindsay Loyd; Neena K Sharma
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2015

4.  Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Pain Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Clinton J Devin; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Steven Z George; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; R Denzler; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Increased preoperative knowledge reduces surgery-related anxiety: a randomised clinical trial in 100 spinal stenosis patients.

Authors:  Jukka Kesänen; Helena Leino-Kilpi; Teija Lund; Liisa Montin; Pauli Puukka; Kirsi Valkeapää
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Simona Ferrante; Marco Teli; Barbara Rocca; Calogero Foti; Alessio Lovi; Marco Brayda Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

9.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery.

Authors:  A H McGregor; C J Doré; T P Morris; S Morris; K Jamrozik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.