Literature DB >> 24242781

Social labeling, stereotyping, and observer bias in workers' compensation: The impact of provider-patient interaction on outcome.

L O Niemeyer1.   

Abstract

When injured workers with chronic musculoskeletal disorders are viewed through the narrow lens of the biomedical model, the role of situational factors is not acknowledged, and their illness behaviors and delayed recovery are often attributed to personal weakness or a desire for secondary gain. This leads to a tendency toward blame and the application of stigmatizing social labels. An overt or implied social label that carries a stigma can set into motion therapeutically counterproductive biases in social perception within the provider-patient relationship. One of most powerful of these has been called the self-fulfilling prophecy, in which expectancy-driven behaviors of the clinician, case manager, or insurance representative can subtly direct the patient to behave in a manner consistent with expectations. Justification for an attitudinal shift among providers of workers' compensation services is proposed, along with application of the biopsychosocial framework of health psychology to the problem of delayed recovery in injured workers.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 24242781     DOI: 10.1007/BF01073691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  30 in total

Review 1.  Low back pain.

Authors:  C Leboeuf
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The concept of illness behavior.

Authors:  D MECHANIC
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1962-02

3.  Characteristics and frequency of malingering among patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Frank Leavitt; Jerry J Sweet
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  A general classification of abnormal illness behaviours.

Authors:  I Pilowsky
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1978-06

5.  Pilgrimage of pain: the illness experiences of women with repetition strain injury and the search for credibility.

Authors:  J Reid; C Ewan; E Lowy
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Patient characteristics that elicit negative responses from family physicians.

Authors:  D Klein; J Najman; A F Kohrman; C Munro
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  A system for evaluating and treating chronic back disability.

Authors:  V Mooney; D Cairns; J Robertson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1976-05

8.  Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain.

Authors:  C G Greenough; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Worker rehabilitation programs. Separating fact from fiction.

Authors:  A J Haig; S Penha
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-05

10.  Disability exaggeration as a predictor of functional restoration outcomes for patients with chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  R G Hazard; A Bendix; J W Fenwick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Perceptions of a Quality of Work-Life Survey from the Perspective of Employees in a Canadian Cancer Centre.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2007

2.  The potential impact of the Workers' Compensation System on quality of life outcomes: A clinical analysis.

Authors:  P M Trief; R G Donelson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-09

3.  The "toxic dose" of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected.

Authors:  Ellen MacEachen; Agnieszka Kosny; Sue Ferrier; Lori Chambers
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  Healing or harming? Healthcare provider interactions with injured workers and insurers in workers' compensation systems.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kilgour; Agnieszka Kosny; Donna McKenzie; Alex Collie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.