Literature DB >> 18348881

Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement.

Andrew G Lee1, Karl C Golnik, Thomas A Oetting, Hilary A Beaver, H Culver Boldt, Richard Olson, Emily Greenlee, Michael D Abramoff, A Tim Johnson, Keith Carter.   

Abstract

The current resident selection process for ophthalmology has undergone little change over the last several years and remains highly dependent on the traditional selection factors (i.e., grades, honors, letters of recommendation, and an interview). Unfortunately, these selection factors have not been shown to be consistently predictive of future resident performance. In addition, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated implementation of six new competencies in resident training in the USA and the current selection process does not directly recruit for these competencies. We propose an implementation strategy to re-engineer and improve the resident selection process in ophthalmology and potentially develop assessments that would be predictive of actual downstream resident performance that would encompass the ACGME related competencies. An intra-departmental Task Force for the ACGME Competencies reviewed a PubMed literature search regarding resident selection. A content expert (AGL) gleaned selected "good practices" from the literature review and summarized the results. Specific recommendations were reviewed for topicality to ophthalmology and where possible for feasibility, reliability, and validity. We summarize several good practices identified from the literature review and propose an implementation matrix for aligning the resident application process with the ACGME competencies that might include: using a standardized and consolidated academic score for the cognitive domains; converting the letter of recommendation format into a letter of evaluation; standardizing the letters of evaluation, including the "Dean's letter"; using behavior specific interview techniques with standardized questions; and developing a specialty based consensus for the selection of traits specific to ophthalmology that might predict success. The resident selection process for ophthalmology might be improved by implementation of specific good practices from the literature. Ophthalmology should strive to develop applicant selection tools that might be useful for predicting residency performance and that would align with the ACGME competency mandate for tools to predict future performance as a physician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18348881     DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  10 in total

1.  Should Medical Grades be Standardized? Improving the Resident Selection Process.

Authors:  Erika Shimahara
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Brenda S Houmard; Sidharth Oberoi; Anton Manyak; Seine Chiang; Sara Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

3.  Do students' and authors' genders affect evaluations? A linguistic analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Jocelyn Chertoff; Barbara Lee; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Council of emergency medicine residency directors standardized letter of recommendation writers' questionnaire.

Authors:  Cullen B Hegarty; David R Lane; Jeffrey N Love; Christopher I Doty; Nicole M DeIorio; Sarah Ronan-Bentle; John Howell
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-06

5.  Thematic Analysis of Emergency Medicine Applicants' Personal Statements.

Authors:  Xiao Chi Zhang; Jeremy Lipman; Randy Jensen; Kendra Parekh
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-05-29

6.  Attitudes towards and impact of letters of recommendation for anesthesiology residency applicants.

Authors:  Carl E Jn Pierre; Garret M Weber; Apolonia E Abramowicz
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

7.  Utilization of a New Customizable Scoring Tool to Recruit and Select Pulmonary/Critical Care Fellows.

Authors:  Susanti R Ie; Jessica L Ratcliffe; Catalina Rubio; Kermit S Zhang; Katherine Shaver; David W Musick
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 8.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  Linguistic analysis of pediatric residency personal statements: gender differences.

Authors:  Jessica C Babal; Aubrey D Gower; John G Frohna; Megan A Moreno
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Gender-based differences in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants.

Authors:  Fei Lin; Soo Kyung Oh; Lynn K Gordon; Stacy L Pineles; Jamie B Rosenberg; Irena Tsui
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.