Literature DB >> 18346942

Using the Internet to search for cancer clinical trials: a comparative audit of clinical trial search tools.

Nancy L Atkinson1, Sandra L Saperstein, Holly A Massett, Colleen Ryan Leonard, Lakshmi Grama, Rick Manrow.   

Abstract

Advancing the clinical trial research process to improve cancer treatment necessitates helping people with cancer identify and enroll in studies, and researchers are using the power of the Internet to facilitate this process. This study used a content analysis of online cancer clinical trial search tools to understand what people with cancer might encounter. The content analysis revealed that clinical trial search tools were easy to identify using a popular search engine, but their functionality and content varied greatly. Most required that users be fairly knowledgeable about their medical condition and sophisticated in their web navigation skills. The ability to search by a specific health condition or type of cancer was the most common search strategy. The more complex tools required that users input detailed information about their personal medical history and have knowledge of specific clinical trial terminology. Search tools, however, only occasionally advised users to consult their doctors regarding clinical trial decision-making. This, along with the complexity of the tools suggests that online search tools may not adequately facilitate the clinical trial recruitment process. Findings from this analysis can be used as a framework from which to systematically examine actual consumer experience with online clinical trial search tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18346942      PMCID: PMC2724745          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  15 in total

1.  Clinical research and the NIH--a report card.

Authors:  David G Nathan; Jean D Wilson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Public perceptions of information sources concerning bioterrorism before and after anthrax attacks: an analysis of national survey data.

Authors:  William E Pollard
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2003

3.  On-line information about cancer clinical trials: evaluating the Web sites of comprehensive cancer centers.

Authors:  Valerie Monaco; Sandra K Krills
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

4.  Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography.

Authors:  L C Lovato; K Hill; S Hertert; D B Hunninghake; J L Probstfield
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1997-08

Review 5.  How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review.

Authors:  Janet M Morahan-Martin
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2004-10

6.  Is the information "fair and balanced" in direct-to-consumer prescription drug websites?

Authors:  Jisu Huh; Brenda J Cude
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Ross; A Grant; C Counsell; W Gillespie; I Russell; R Prescott
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert L Comis; Jon D Miller; Carolyn R Aldigé; Linda Krebs; Ellen Stoval
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: study design barriers.

Authors:  Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Chiledum Ahaghotu; Melvin Gaskins; Fitzroy W Dawkins; Duane Smoot; Octavius D Polk; Robert Gooding; Robert L DeWitty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  User-centered research on breast cancer patient needs and preferences of an Internet-based clinical trial matching system.

Authors:  Nancy L Atkinson; Holly A Massett; Christy Mylks; Bethany Hanna; Mary Jo Deering; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evaluating the Use of Plain Language in a Cancer Clinical Trial Website/App.

Authors:  Paula L Schultz; Regina Carlisle; Chesley Cheatham; Melissa O'Grady
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  eTACTS: a method for dynamically filtering clinical trial search results.

Authors:  Riccardo Miotto; Silis Jiang; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  What do patients search for when seeking clinical trial information online?

Authors:  Chintan O Patel; Vivek Garg; Sharib A Khan
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

4.  ResearchMatch: a national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Kirstin W Scott; Laurie Lebo; Niknik Hassan; Chad Lightner; Jill Pulley
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Outcomes of a cancer clinical trial matching service.

Authors:  Ted Gansler; Man Jin; Joseph Bauer; Katie Dahlquist; Larissa Tis; Katherine Sharpe; Robert Comis; Kimberly Naples; James Kepner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Assessing the impact of user-centered research on a clinical trial eHealth tool via counterbalanced research design.

Authors:  Nancy L Atkinson; Holly A Massett; Christy Mylks; Lauren A McCormack; Julia Kish-Doto; Bradford W Hesse; Min Qi Wang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Patient internet use surrounding cancer clinical trials: clinician perceptions and responses.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Sarah Schramm; Stephen Hillis
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Adoption, acceptability, and accuracy of an online clinical trial matching website for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellyn Cohen; Jeff Belkora; Joanne Tyler; Joan Schreiner; Mary Jo Deering; Lakshmi Grama; Brenda Duggan; Julie Illi; Julia Pederson; Aprajita Anand; Alexandra Teng; Erin McCreary; Dan Moore; Debu Tripathy; Michael Hogarth; Morton Lieberman; John Park; Laura Esserman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  ClinicalTrials.gov as a data source for semi-automated point-of-care trial eligibility screening.

Authors:  Pascal B Pfiffner; JiWon Oh; Timothy A Miller; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Outcomes of a National Clinical Trial Matching and Navigation Service for Patients With a Blood Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Sae-Hau; Kate Disare; Margo Michaels; Alissa Gentile; Leah Szumita; Katherine Treiman; Elisa S Weiss
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.