Literature DB >> 21347048

What do patients search for when seeking clinical trial information online?

Chintan O Patel1, Vivek Garg, Sharib A Khan.   

Abstract

The Internet has become a common source for consumers to seek health information across a wide range of topics including searching for clinical trials. However, not much is known about what consumers search for in relation to clinical trials and how they formulate their search queries. In this study, we use log file data from TrialX.com, a consumer-centric website that provides clinical trial information to ascertain patterns in consumer queries. We analyzed semantic patterns in the queries by mapping query keywords to the UMLS Semantic Types and performed a manual evaluation of user paths. We found that the queries can be grouped into combinations of information needs related to condition, location and treatment. The results also suggested that the consumers using longer search queries with multiple Semantic Types are more likely to take action to participate in clinical trials. The study provides early insights that can be used to inform changes in website content and information display to improve clinical trials information seeking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21347048      PMCID: PMC3041375     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  11 in total

Review 1.  Patient recruitment: the costly and growing bottleneck in drug development.

Authors:  Kathleen B Drennan
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program.

Authors:  A R Aronson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Ricardo J Wray
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

4.  Understanding search failures in consumer health information systems.

Authors:  Alexa T McCray; Tony Tse
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

5.  Positive attitudes and failed queries: an exploration of the conundrums of consumer health information retrieval.

Authors:  Qing T Zeng; Sandra Kogan; Robert M Plovnick; Jonathan Crowell; Eve-Marie Lacroix; Robert A Greenes
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Exploring user navigation during online health information seeking.

Authors:  Laurel Graham; Tony Tse; Alla Keselman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

7.  Using the Internet to search for cancer clinical trials: a comparative audit of clinical trial search tools.

Authors:  Nancy L Atkinson; Sandra L Saperstein; Holly A Massett; Colleen Ryan Leonard; Lakshmi Grama; Rick Manrow
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Christian Köhler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

9.  The Unified Medical Language System.

Authors:  D A Lindberg; B L Humphreys; A T McCray
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?

Authors:  Elizabeth Sillence; Pam Briggs; Peter Richard Harris; Lesley Fishwick
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  10 in total

1.  eTACTS: a method for dynamically filtering clinical trial search results.

Authors:  Riccardo Miotto; Silis Jiang; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Unsupervised mining of frequent tags for clinical eligibility text indexing.

Authors:  Riccardo Miotto; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Applying MetaMap to Medline for identifying novel associations in a large clinical dataset: a feasibility analysis.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Mohammed Saeed; Kai Zheng; Qiaozhu Mei; Kerby Shedden; Alan R Aronson; Naren Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Using Internet search engines to obtain medical information: a comparative study.

Authors:  Liupu Wang; Juexin Wang; Michael Wang; Yong Li; Yanchun Liang; Dong Xu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Characteristics of clinical trial websites: information distribution between ClinicalTrials.gov and 13 primary registries in the WHO registry network.

Authors:  Daisuke Ogino; Kunihiko Takahashi; Hajime Sato
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Cross-system evaluation of clinical trial search engines.

Authors:  Silis Y Jiang; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2014-04-07

7.  A content analysis of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) strategies for communicating about clinical research participation online.

Authors:  Elizabeth Flood-Grady; Samantha R Paige; Nicki Karimipour; Paul A Harris; Linda B Cottler; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-12

8.  Readability of Cancer Clinical Trials Websites.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Melissa Beauchemin; Philip Garcia; Moshe Kelsen; Frances L Brogan; Gary K Schwartz; Corey H Basch
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

9.  Characteristics and Causes for Non-Accrued Clinical Research (NACR) at an Academic Medical Institution.

Authors:  Debra G Tice; Kelly A Carroll; Karishma H Bhatt; Steven M Belknap; David Mai; Heather J Gipson; Dennis P West
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-04-23

10.  Parental Evaluation of a Nurse Practitioner-Developed Pediatric Neurosurgery Website.

Authors:  Tina Kovacs Vogel; Manal Kleib; Sandra J Davidson; Shannon D Scott
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-04-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.