Literature DB >> 24214467

High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BI-RADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3T.

Dorota J Wisner1, Nathan Rogers, Vibhas S Deshpande, David N Newitt, Gerhard A Laub, David A Porter, John Kornak, Bonnie N Joe, Nola M Hylton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) on BI-RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI-RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion-to-background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired comparisons.
RESULTS: Of 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion-to-background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss-EPI (1.80 ± 0.71 vs. 1.62 ± 0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss-EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90 ± 0.13; ss-EPI 1.00 ± 0.13; median difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17, -0.02) × 10(-3) mm(2) /sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Increased lesion-to-background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DWI; benign; breast MRI; diffusion; malignant; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24214467      PMCID: PMC4014534          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  18 in total

1.  Drop metastases to the pediatric spine revealed with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Laura L Hayes; Richard A Jones; Susan Palasis; Dolly Aguilera; David A Porter
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-11-04

2.  Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.

Authors:  Nicky H G M Peters; Koen L Vincken; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Peter R Luijten; Willem P Th M Mali; Lambertus W Bartels
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors.

Authors:  Sibel Kul; Aysegul Cansu; Etem Alhan; Hasan Dinc; Gurbuz Gunes; Abdulkadir Reis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.

Authors:  Erika Rubesova; Anne-Sophie Grell; Viviane De Maertelaer; Thierry Metens; Shih-Li Chao; Marc Lemort
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Wendy B DeMartini; Brenda F Kurland; Peter R Eby; Steven W White; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Wolfgang Bogner; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Hubert Bickel; Marek Chmelik; Michael Weber; Thomas H Helbich; Siegfried Trattnig; Stephan Gruber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.

Authors:  Riham H Ei Khouli; Michael A Jacobs; Sarah D Mezban; Peng Huang; Ihab R Kamel; Katarzyna J Macura; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lidia Rosi Medeiros; Célia Scapin Duarte; Daniela Dornelles Rosa; Maria Isabel Edelweiss; Marcia Edelweiss; Fábio Rosa Silva; Erik Paul Winnnikow; Patrícia Duarte Simões Pires; Maria Inês Rosa
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Ahmet Kemal Firat; Bayram Sanli; Hakki Muammer Karakaş; Gulnur Erdem
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Clinical application of readout-segmented- echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric brain.

Authors:  S J Holdsworth; K Yeom; S Skare; A J Gentles; P D Barnes; R Bammer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  19 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumours at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla: a comparison.

Authors:  S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion-weighted MRI characteristics associated with prognostic pathological factors and recurrence risk in invasive ER+/HER2- breast cancers.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Vicky T Nguyen; Habib Rahbar; Daniel S Hippe; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Mara H Rendi; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for Unenhanced Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Hee Jung Shin; Madeline Dang; Habib Rahbar; Katja Pinker; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  High-Spatial-Resolution Multishot Multiplexed Sensitivity-encoding Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Improved Quality of Breast Images and Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Roberto Lo Gullo; Elizabeth A Morris; Toni Larowin; Maggie M Fung; Arnaud Guidon; Katja Pinker; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 5.  Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Noam Nissan; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Can MRI biomarkers at 3 T identify low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Sana Parsian; Diana L Lam; Brian N Dontchos; Nicole K Andeen; Mara H Rendi; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  DWI in the Assessment of Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Nita Amornsiripanitch
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-10

8.  Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating parotid gland tumors.

Authors:  Nan Huang; Zebin Xiao; Yu Chen; Dejun She; Wei Guo; Xiefeng Yang; Qi Chen; Dairong Cao; Tanhui Chen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  A Comparison of Methods for High-Spatial-Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Jessica A McKay; An L Church; Nathan Rubin; Tim H Emory; Noelle F Hoven; Jessica E Kuehn-Hajder; Michael T Nelson; Sudhir Ramanna; Edward J Auerbach; Steen Moeller; Patrick J Bolan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted imaging outside the brain: Consensus statement from an ISMRM-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Ambros J Beer; Thomas Chenevert; David Collins; Constance Lehman; Celso Matos; Anwar R Padhani; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Amita Shukla-Dave; Eric Sigmund; Lawrence Tanenbaum; Harriet Thoeny; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Sebastiano Barbieri; Idoia Corcuera-Solano; Matthew Orton; Savannah C Partridge; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.