Literature DB >> 11161809

Low-copy-number human transgene is recognized as an X inactivation center in mouse ES cells, but fails to induce cis-inactivation in chimeric mice.

B R Migeon1, H Winter, E Kazi, A K Chowdhury, A Hughes, C Haisley-Royster, H Morrison, P Jeppesen.   

Abstract

X chromosome inactivation is initiated from a segment of the mammalian X chromosome called the X inactivation center. Transgenes from this region of the murine X chromosome are providing the means to identify the DNA needed for cis inactivation in mice. We recently showed that chimeric mice carrying transgenes from the human X inactivation center (XIC) region also provide a functional assay for human XIC activity; approximately 6 copies of a 480-kb human transgene (ES-10) were sufficient to initiate random X inactivation in cells of male chimeric mice (Migeon et al., 1999, Genomics, 59, 113-121). Now, we report studies of another human transgene (ES-5), which contains less than 300 kb of the human XIC region on Xq13.2 including an intact XIST locus and which has inserted in one or two copies into mouse chromosome 6. The ES-5 transgene is recognized as an X inactivation center in mouse embryonic stem cells, but is not sufficient to induce random X inactivation in somatic cells of highly chimeric mice. Human transgenes in chimeric mice provide a means to uncouple the key steps in this complex pathway and facilitate the search for essential components of the human XIC region. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11161809     DOI: 10.1006/geno.2000.6421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  8 in total

1.  An ectopic human XIST gene can induce chromosome inactivation in postdifferentiation human HT-1080 cells.

Authors:  Lisa L Hall; Meg Byron; Kosuke Sakai; Laura Carrel; Huntington F Willard; Jeanne B Lawrence
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential X reactivation in human placental cells: implications for reversal of X inactivation.

Authors:  Barbara R Migeon; Joyce Axelman; Peter Jeppesen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Identification of TSIX, encoding an RNA antisense to human XIST, reveals differences from its murine counterpart: implications for X inactivation.

Authors:  B R Migeon; A K Chowdhury; J A Dunston; I McIntosh
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-09-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  X-chromosome epigenetic reprogramming in pluripotent stem cells via noncoding genes.

Authors:  Daniel H Kim; Yesu Jeon; Montserrat C Anguera; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  XIST RNA exhibits nuclear retention and exhibits reduced association with the export factor TAP/NXF1.

Authors:  Hannah R Cohen; Barbara Panning
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected.

Authors:  Lisa L Hall; Meg Byron; John Butler; Klaus A Becker; Angel Nelson; Michal Amit; Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor; Janet Stein; Gary Stein; Carol Ware; Jeanne B Lawrence
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  Identification of regulatory elements flanking human XIST reveals species differences.

Authors:  Samuel C Chang; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.946

8.  Gene trap as a tool for genome annotation and analysis of X chromosome inactivation in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sujoy K Dhara; Nissim Benvenisty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.