Literature DB >> 18330657

Treatment of hemorrhoids in day surgery: stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

Vito Maria Stolfi1, Pierpaolo Sileri, Chiara Micossi, Isabella Carbonaro, Marco Venza, Paolo Gentileschi, Piero Rossi, Alessandro Falchetti, Achille Gaspari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been demonstrated that surgical treatment of hemorrhoids in a day-care basis is possible and safe. The aim of this study was to compare the Longo stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) and the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH).
METHODS: One hundred seventy one patients (95 cases in SH group and 76 cases in MMH group) entered the study: 83 cases were III degree hemorrhoids, 88 IV degree. A priori and a post hoc power analysis were performed. Results, prospectively collected, were compared using chi squared test and student t test. Visual analog scale was used for pain evaluation. Postoperative pain, duration of pain, wound secretion, bleeding, resumption of a normal lifestyle, and postoperative complication were evaluated.
RESULTS: Surgical time was 28.41+/-10.78 for MMH and 28.30+/-13.28 min in SH (P=0.94). Postoperative pain was not different between MMH and SH during the first two postoperative days (4.73+/-2.91 vs 5.1+/-3.048; P=0.4), during the following 6 days, patients treated with SH had less pain (4.63+/-2.04 in MMH vs 3.60+/-2.35 in SH; P=0.006). In the SH group, seven patients needed further hospital stay for complicated course. SH showed higher incidence of anal fissure compared with MMH (6.3% vs 0%; P=0.025) but no differences in urinary retention, anal stricture, urgency, or anal hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that SH is associated with less postoperative pain and shorter postoperative symptoms, compared with MMH. SH may be a viable addition to the therapy for hemorrhoids with some advantages in early postoperative pain and some disadvantages in postoperative complications and costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18330657     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0497-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a word of caution.

Authors:  Mario Pescatori
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ping Lan; Xjiaojian Wu; Xuyu Zhou; Jianping Wang; Longjuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R Shalaby; A Desoky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Postdefaecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine.

Authors:  M A Thaha; L A Irvine; R J C Steele; K L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.

Authors:  A J Senagore; M Singer; H Abcarian; J Fleshman; M Corman; S Wexner; S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew Maw; Kong-Weng Eu; Francis Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome.

Authors:  Matti Kairaluoma; Kyösti Nuorva; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids.

Authors:  K J Lumb; P H D Colquhoun; R A Malthaner; S Jayaraman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18
View more
  15 in total

1.  Gabapentin significantly decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain: a prospective study.

Authors:  Vitaliy Poylin; Jeanne Quinn; Kristin Messer; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liesel J Porrett; Jemma K Porrett; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 3.  Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  B Vinson-Bonnet; T Higuero; J L Faucheron; A Senejoux; F Pigot; L Siproudhis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  S Leardi; B Pessia; M Mascio; F Piccione; M Schietroma; R Pietroletti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Stapled and conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: different solutions for different targets.

Authors:  Alessandra Panarese; Daniele Pironi; Maurizio Vendettuoli; Stefano Pontone; Stefano Arcieri; Andrea Conversi; Anna Maria Romani; Angelo Filippini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids.

Authors:  C Ratto; P Giordano; L Donisi; A Parello; F Litta; G B Doglietto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  The treatment of acute appendicitis in two age-based groups during COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective experience in a COVID-19 referral hospital.

Authors:  Giorgio Lisi; Michela Campanelli; Maria Rosaria Mastrangeli; Domenico Spoletini; Rosa Menditto; Simona Grande; Massimiliano Boccuzzi; Michele Grande
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Outcomes of Modified Tissue Selection Therapy Stapler in the Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Chenchen Yuan; Chongjun Zhou; Rong Xue; Xiaofeng Jin; Chun Jin; Chenguo Zheng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

9.  Medical and surgical treatment of haemorrhoids and anal fissure in Crohn's disease: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Stefano D'Ugo; Luana Franceschilli; Federica Cadeddu; Laura Leccesi; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Emma Calabrese; Giovanni Milito; Nicola Di Lorenzo; Achille L Gaspari; Pierpaolo Sileri
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Q Z Ruan; W English; A Hotouras; C Bryant; F Taylor; S Andreani; S D Wexner; S Banerjee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.