Literature DB >> 21505901

Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids.

C Ratto1, P Giordano, L Donisi, A Parello, F Litta, G B Doglietto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional treatment of fourth-degree haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is conventional haemorrhoidectomy and is frequently associated with significant pain and morbidity. In recent years, the use of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for the treatment of HD has increased. The procedure aims to decrease the arterial blood flow to the haemorrhoids. Moreover, since a rectal mucopexy to treat the prolapsing component has become part of the THD technique, this treatment is also indicated for more advanced HD. The aim of this study was to assess the possible role of THD in the treatment of fourth-degree HD.
METHODS: All patients with non-fibrotic fourth-degree HD were offered the THD procedure with mucopexy. Excision of skin tags was added to THD and mucopexy, when needed. A specific score was used to assess HD severity, ranging from 0 (no HD) to 20 (worst HD). The mean preoperative score was 18.1 ± 1.8.
RESULTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients (mean age 50.4 ± 13.8 years; 19 men) with fourth-degree HD were prospectively enroled. An average of 6 arteries were identified and transfixed. Mucopexy was achieved with a 3-6 sector plication of rectal mucosa. Mean operating time was 33 ± 12 min. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative morbidity included 3 (8.6%) haemorrhoidal thromboses (1 requiring surgery) and 2 (5.7%) episodes of bleeding (1 requiring surgical haemostasis). Five patients (14.3%) had urinary retention requiring catheterization. At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 2-28 months), symptoms had resolved or significantly improved in 33 (94%) patients. Nine patients (25.7%) reported irregular bleeding, 3 patients (8.6%) mild anal pain, 4 patients (11.4%) transient anal burning and 4 patients (11.4%) tenesmus. Ten patients (28.6%) experienced some degree of residual prolapse, significant only in 2 (5.7%) who required further surgery. There was no anorectal stenosis, and no faecal incontinence was reported. At a median follow-up of 10 months, the symptomatic score was 2.5 ± 2.5 (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization seems to be a safe and effective treatment for fourth-degree HD providing a significant improvement of symptoms for the majority of patients. When present, persisting symptoms are mostly transient, occasional or limited in severity, and only a very few patients require further intervention. Larger series and longer follow-up to further assess the role of THD in this challenging group of pts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21505901     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-011-0689-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  30 in total

Review 1.  Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations.

Authors:  Valter Ripetti; Marco Caricato; Augusto Arullani
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Intra-abdominal bleeding from a seromuscular tear of an ascending rectosigmoid intramural hematoma after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Goran Augustin; Dubravko Smud; Emil Kinda; Mate Majerovic; Zeljko Jelincic; Tihomir Kekez; Petar Matosevic
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Life threatening sepsis and mortality following stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  William C Cirocco
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  N Sohn; J S Aronoff; F S Cohen; M A Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature.

Authors:  Héctor Ortiz; José Marzo; Pedro Armendáriz; Mario De Miguel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy--is there any difference?

Authors:  G Arbman; H Krook; S Haapaniemi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pasquale Giordano; Gianpiero Gravante; Roberto Sorge; Lauren Ovens; Piero Nastro
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03

8.  Transanal haemorrhoidal artery echodoppler ligation and anopexy (THD) is effective for II and III degree haemorrhoids: a prospective multicentric study.

Authors:  A Infantino; R Bellomo; P P Dal Monte; C Salafia; C Tagariello; C A Tonizzo; L Spazzafumo; G Romano; D F Altomare
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  The superior rectal artery and its branching pattern with regard to its clinical influence on ligation techniques for internal hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Felix Aigner; Gerd Bodner; Friedrich Conrad; Godwin Mbaka; Alfons Kreczy; Helga Fritsch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  18 in total

1.  Comparison of the early results of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Yoshiyuki Kiyasu; Wataru Fujii; Nobuyasu Kano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Rectoanal repair versus suture haemorrhoidopexy: a comparative study on suture mucopexy procedures for high-grade haemorrhoids.

Authors:  G E Theodoropoulos; N V Michalopoulos; D Linardoutsos; P Stamopoulos; I Flessas; D Tsamis; G C Zografos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Conservative and surgical treatment of haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Simona Giuratrabocchetta
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  S Leardi; B Pessia; M Mascio; F Piccione; M Schietroma; R Pietroletti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Response to the letter "Reviewers should have known better" by Mahir Gachabayov.

Authors:  S Biondo; L Trenti; B Miguel; E Kreisler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: a critical appraisal of the current options.

Authors:  Marlise Mello Cerato; Nilo Luiz Cerato; Patrícia Passos; Alberto Treigue; Daniel C Damin
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Comparison of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation and stapled haemorrhoidopexy in management of haemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective study and literature review.

Authors:  Y P Tsang; K L B Fok; Y S H Cheung; K W M Li; C N Tang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients' contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study.

Authors:  Qurat Ul Ain; Yasir Bashir; Emmanuel Eguare
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus stapler haemorrhoidopexy: a randomised trial with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P Lucarelli; M Picchio; M Caporossi; F De Angelis; A Di Filippo; F Stipa; E Spaziani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement.

Authors:  M Trompetto; G Clerico; G F Cocorullo; P Giordano; F Marino; J Martellucci; G Milito; M Mistrangelo; C Ratto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.