Literature DB >> 27601250

Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.

S Leardi1,2, B Pessia3, M Mascio3, F Piccione3, M Schietroma3, R Pietroletti4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) and the Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (DG-THD) are minimally invasive procedures for the surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. This study aims to verify the efficacy of the DG-THD versus the SH in the treatment of third-degree hemorrhoids.
METHOD: One hundred consecutive patients were causally allocated to either procedure, obtaining two groups of 50 pts. A clinical examination was performed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days after the operation. Quality of life, anal symptoms, recurrence of hemorrhoids, and reoperation were assessed by means of a questionnaire and of a clinical examination at long-term follow-up (7.0 year average).
RESULTS: At short-term follow-up, the median postoperative pain score was significantly lower in DG-THD group compared to SH group, (V.A.S 2 vs 6; t = 2.65, p < 0.01). The morbidity rate and the return to normal life and work were similar after the two procedures. At long-term follow-up, the incidence of piles was not statistically different between the two groups (DG-THD 10.0 %; SH 14.0 %). No differences were reported by patients in terms of satisfaction for surgery.
CONCLUSION: SH and DG-THD procedures do not show significantly different results with regard to the patients outcome. However, considering the lower p. o. pain, the DG-THD might be proposed as the first line treatment in third-degree hemorrhoids.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DG-transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization; Hemorrhoids; Recurrence of hemorrhoids; Stapled hemorrhoidopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601250     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3220-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  30 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  M S Sajid; U Parampalli; P Whitehouse; P Sains; M R McFall; M K Baig
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Sigmoid intramural hematoma and hemoperitoneum: an early severe complication after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  G De Santis; P Gola; L Lancione; F Sista; R Pietroletti; S Leardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries with mucopexy: A technique for the future.

Authors:  C Ratto; V de Parades
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.043

4.  Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Jai Bikhchandani; P N Agarwal; Ravi Kant; V K Malik
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.

Authors:  A J Senagore; M Singer; H Abcarian; J Fleshman; M Corman; S Wexner; S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results.

Authors:  Domenico Palimento; Marcello Picchio; Ugo Attanasio; Assunta Lombardi; Chiara Bambini; Andrea Renda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study.

Authors:  I Goulimaris; I Kanellos; E Christoforidis; I Mantzoros; Ch Odisseos; D Betsis
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

8.  Transanal haemorrhoidal artery echodoppler ligation and anopexy (THD) is effective for II and III degree haemorrhoids: a prospective multicentric study.

Authors:  A Infantino; R Bellomo; P P Dal Monte; C Salafia; C Tagariello; C A Tonizzo; L Spazzafumo; G Romano; D F Altomare
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes.

Authors:  P Giordano; P Nastro; A Davies; G Gravante
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  2 in total

1.  Rectal perforation secondary to transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation.

Authors:  S Greensmith; B Ip; Z Vujovic
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.951

2.  Interventional treatments for prolapsing haemorrhoids: network meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Z Jin; S Bhat; K-T Lee; W Xia; A G Hill
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.