Literature DB >> 14523077

Stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane: radial and longitudinal variations.

Gulam Emadi1, Claus-Peter Richter, Peter Dallos.   

Abstract

Experimental data on the mechanical properties of the tissues of the mammalian cochlea are essential for understanding the frequency- and location-dependent motion patterns that result in response to incoming sound waves. Within the cochlea, sound-induced vibrations are transduced into neural activity by the organ of Corti, the gross motion of which is dependent on the motion of the underlying basilar membrane. In this study we present data on stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane measured at multiple positions within a cochlear cross section and at multiple locations along the length of the cochlea. A basic analysis of these data using relatively simple models of cochlear mechanics reveals our most important result: the experimentally measured longitudinal stiffness gradient at the middle of the pectinate zone of the basilar membrane (4.43 dB/mm) can account for changes of best frequency along the length of the cochlea. Furthermore, our results indicate qualitative changes of stiffness-deflection curves as a function of radial position; in particular, there are differences in the rate of stiffness growth with increasing tissue deflection. Longitudinal coupling within the basilar membrane/organ of Corti complex is determined to have a space constant of 21 microm in the middle turn of the cochlea. The bulk of our data was obtained in the hemicochlea preparation, and we include a comparison of this set of data to data obtained in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14523077     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00446.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Spatial extent of cochlear infrared neural stimulation determined by tone-on-light masking.

Authors:  Agnella Izzo Matic; Joseph T Walsh; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  A critique of the critical cochlea: Hopf--a bifurcation--is better than none.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; Frank Jülicher; Pascal Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Force transmission in the organ of Corti micromachine.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Mechanical responses of the organ of corti to acoustic and electrical stimulation in vitro.

Authors:  Dylan K Chan; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Developmental changes of mechanics measured in the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Gulam Emadi; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-29

6.  Optical parameter variability in laser nerve stimulation: a study of pulse duration, repetition rate, and wavelength.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; E Duco Jansen; Mark Bendett; Jim Webb; Heather Ralph; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  The role of organ of Corti mass in passive cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Ombeline de La Rochefoucauld; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Tectorial membrane stiffness gradients.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Gulam Emadi; Geoffrey Getnick; Alicia Quesnel; Peter Dallos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Laser stimulation of auditory neurons: effect of shorter pulse duration and penetration depth.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; Heather Ralph; Jim Webb; Mark Bendett; Jonathon Wells; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  In vivo impedance of the gerbil cochlear partition at auditory frequencies.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.