Literature DB >> 18318619

Apparent contrast differs across the vertical meridian: visual and attentional factors.

Stuart Fuller1, Ruby Z Rodriguez, Marisa Carrasco.   

Abstract

It is known that visual performance is better on the horizontal than the vertical meridian, and in the lower than the upper region of the vertical meridian (Vertical Meridian Asymmetry, "VMA"), and that exogenous spatial attention increases the apparent contrast of a stimulus. Here we investigate whether the VMA also leads to differences in the subjective appearance of contrast between the upper and lower vertical meridian, and how the effects of exogenous spatial attention on appearance interact with the VMA. Two Gabor stimuli were presented North and South of fixation at 4 degrees eccentricity along the vertical meridian. Observers were asked to report the orientation of the Gabor that was higher in contrast. By assessing which stimulus observers perceived to be higher in contrast, we obtained psychometric functions and their concomitant points of subjective equality (PSE). These functions were measured both when a neutral cue was presented in the middle of the display and transient attention was deployed via a peripheral cue to the location of one of the stimuli. Observers were told that the cues were uninformative as to the stimulus contrast or its orientation. We report two novel findings. First, apparent contrast is higher on the lower vertical meridian than on the upper. Second, the attentional enhancement of apparent contrast is asymmetrical with both low and high contrast stimuli; the effect of exogenous spatial attention is greater on the lower than the upper vertical meridian. As in prior studies, we find no corresponding asymmetry in orientation discrimination. Signal detection-based models explain the asymmetrical appearance effects as a function of differential multiplicative gain factors for the North and South locations, and predict a similar but much smaller asymmetry for orientation discrimination.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318619      PMCID: PMC2789458          DOI: 10.1167/8.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  46 in total

1.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron; Joanna C Tai; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Attentional weighting: a possible account of visual field asymmetries in visual search?

Authors:  Amy A Rezec; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

4.  Exogenous attention and color perception: performance and appearance of saturation and hue.

Authors:  Stuart Fuller; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Christian Henrich; Stefan Treue
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays.

Authors:  D G Pelli; L Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Transient covert attention does alter appearance: a reply to Schneider (2006).

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-08

8.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

9.  Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1987-12-22       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: implications for central magnification factors.

Authors:  V H Perry; A Cowey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  42 in total

1.  Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: a reply to Schneider (2011).

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; John J McDonald; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Cross-modal attention enhances perceived contrast.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  How Attention Affects Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Antoine Barbot
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

6.  Attention enhances contrast appearance via increased input baseline of neural responses.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Perception of differences in naturalistic dynamic scenes, and a V1-based model.

Authors:  Michelle P S To; Iain D Gilchrist; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Attentional trade-offs maintain the tracking of moving objects across saccades.

Authors:  Martin Szinte; Marisa Carrasco; Patrick Cavanagh; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.